<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Budget SLR Gourmet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Sloan</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/comment-page-1#comment-16815</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.01.04/the-budget-slr-gourmet#comment-16815</guid>
		<description>This was fun, of course the cameras I&#039;m recommending these days aren&#039;t on there. I&#039;d love an update!
My current recommendations:

if a viewfinder is not required:
    NEX-3? (the old models going for cheap)
    olympus pen (whatever is going for really cheap)

    Punch line: real cameras real cheap and you can put lots of strange lenses on them. I&#039;m also a fan of people learning on MF

With Viewfinder:
    One of the sony alpha cameras, preferably last season: the cheap and friendly primes are finally available and they are all stabilised!
    Nikon d3200: cool sensor from what I&#039;ve seen and there are reasonable primes to be had!
    Canon 5D mk1: Its cheap now! it is full frame! 

Lenses: Kit zoom if you must, 35mm and 50mm primes 85mm if there is one cheap. For long lenses on canon: old OM lenses, Nikon: old mf nikons, for Sony: something new and very expensive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was fun, of course the cameras I&#8217;m recommending these days aren&#8217;t on there. I&#8217;d love an update!<br />
My current recommendations:</p>
<p>if a viewfinder is not required:<br />
    NEX-3? (the old models going for cheap)<br />
    olympus pen (whatever is going for really cheap)</p>
<p>    Punch line: real cameras real cheap and you can put lots of strange lenses on them. I&#8217;m also a fan of people learning on MF</p>
<p>With Viewfinder:<br />
    One of the sony alpha cameras, preferably last season: the cheap and friendly primes are finally available and they are all stabilised!<br />
    Nikon d3200: cool sensor from what I&#8217;ve seen and there are reasonable primes to be had!<br />
    Canon 5D mk1: Its cheap now! it is full frame! </p>
<p>Lenses: Kit zoom if you must, 35mm and 50mm primes 85mm if there is one cheap. For long lenses on canon: old OM lenses, Nikon: old mf nikons, for Sony: something new and very expensive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/comment-page-1#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.01.04/the-budget-slr-gourmet#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Roger,

Thanks for the quick reply. I&#039;m considering the Canon EOS Rebel XSi / 450D as my first venture into DSLR. I assume this is a crop sensor. How does focal length differ between crop sensor &amp; full frame? W/ all the choices would the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens be a good start?

Thanks for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>Thanks for the quick reply. I&#8217;m considering the Canon EOS Rebel XSi / 450D as my first venture into DSLR. I assume this is a crop sensor. How does focal length differ between crop sensor &amp; full frame? W/ all the choices would the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens be a good start?</p>
<p>Thanks for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/comment-page-1#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.01.04/the-budget-slr-gourmet#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Dave,
A full frame has a sensor the size of 35mm photo film. A crop sensor is smaller, about 2/3 the size of a full frame. A 4/3 sensor is smaller still, about half the size of full frame. Point and shoot cameras have much smaller sensors, about 1/8 the size of a full frame sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
A full frame has a sensor the size of 35mm photo film. A crop sensor is smaller, about 2/3 the size of a full frame. A 4/3 sensor is smaller still, about half the size of full frame. Point and shoot cameras have much smaller sensors, about 1/8 the size of a full frame sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/comment-page-1#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.01.04/the-budget-slr-gourmet#comment-812</guid>
		<description>As a person still heavy in film &amp; considering moving into digital SLR, yeh, I have a couple digital point &amp; shoots. Can you explain crop sensor compared to full frame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a person still heavy in film &amp; considering moving into digital SLR, yeh, I have a couple digital point &amp; shoots. Can you explain crop sensor compared to full frame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/comment-page-1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.01.04/the-budget-slr-gourmet#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Hi, Roger.

Have you redone this type of article recently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Roger.</p>
<p>Have you redone this type of article recently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/01/the-budget-slr-gourmet/comment-page-1#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.01.04/the-budget-slr-gourmet#comment-755</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d actually recommend a cheap Sony for the lower end over Canon or Nikon. Why? In-body IS. With Sony, you can pick up an 18-200mm lens for $240. For Canon and Nikon, if you want IS (and the lens is almost useless without), you&#039;re looking at over $500. With Sony, you can get a cheap 50mm or 35mm f/1.8 prime, which with IS gives the ultimate in low-light performance. Maxxum used lenses are also a bargain, and again, the used lens market becomes much more useful with IS in the body. 

The older Sony cameras -- a100, a700, 5D, 7D, etc. also had user-interfaces that provided a much smoother learning curve than Canon or Nikon. Sony had a usable automatic mode with control over exposure time, ISO, etc., which was as good for point-and-click as Canon and Nikon, but let the beginner play with more advanced features too. Sadly, newer Sonys did away with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d actually recommend a cheap Sony for the lower end over Canon or Nikon. Why? In-body IS. With Sony, you can pick up an 18-200mm lens for $240. For Canon and Nikon, if you want IS (and the lens is almost useless without), you&#8217;re looking at over $500. With Sony, you can get a cheap 50mm or 35mm f/1.8 prime, which with IS gives the ultimate in low-light performance. Maxxum used lenses are also a bargain, and again, the used lens market becomes much more useful with IS in the body. </p>
<p>The older Sony cameras &#8212; a100, a700, 5D, 7D, etc. also had user-interfaces that provided a much smoother learning curve than Canon or Nikon. Sony had a usable automatic mode with control over exposure time, ISO, etc., which was as good for point-and-click as Canon and Nikon, but let the beginner play with more advanced features too. Sadly, newer Sonys did away with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
