<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Camera vs. The Eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelo Ragone</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye/comment-page-1#comment-24836</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelo Ragone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.03.14/the-camera-vs-the-eye#comment-24836</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger:

I think it´s an easier problem. Let´s say you got a 20 x 30 cm photo in your hands, you will probably watch it at 30 - 40 cm. But if the photo is 2 x 3 m, you will see it from 3 - 4 m. That´s the &quot;normal angle&quot; of vision. And from that you get the &quot;normal lens&quot;.

&quot;Normal lens&quot; is not the right name for it. It should be &quot;common lens&quot;. Because honestly, you may or you may not prefer this angle of vision.

Marcelo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger:</p>
<p>I think it´s an easier problem. Let´s say you got a 20 x 30 cm photo in your hands, you will probably watch it at 30 &#8211; 40 cm. But if the photo is 2 x 3 m, you will see it from 3 &#8211; 4 m. That´s the &#8220;normal angle&#8221; of vision. And from that you get the &#8220;normal lens&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Normal lens&#8221; is not the right name for it. It should be &#8220;common lens&#8221;. Because honestly, you may or you may not prefer this angle of vision.</p>
<p>Marcelo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Happel</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye/comment-page-1#comment-24774</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Happel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.03.14/the-camera-vs-the-eye#comment-24774</guid>
		<description>I came across this post via PetaPixel&#039;s broadcast of it today.  As an Optometrist and an advanced amateur photographer, I found this article to be accurate, entertaining and informative.  Nicely done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this post via PetaPixel&#8217;s broadcast of it today.  As an Optometrist and an advanced amateur photographer, I found this article to be accurate, entertaining and informative.  Nicely done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye/comment-page-1#comment-24771</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.03.14/the-camera-vs-the-eye#comment-24771</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an eye doctor and a photography hobbyist. Well done on an informative article that was remarkably accurate regarding visual perception and physiology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an eye doctor and a photography hobbyist. Well done on an informative article that was remarkably accurate regarding visual perception and physiology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nqina Dlamini</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye/comment-page-1#comment-15567</link>
		<dc:creator>Nqina Dlamini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.03.14/the-camera-vs-the-eye#comment-15567</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been greedily consuming your articles on this blog. It is quite a pleasure to read them. I enjoyed this one too. I was surprised with the 130 million pixel resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been greedily consuming your articles on this blog. It is quite a pleasure to read them. I enjoyed this one too. I was surprised with the 130 million pixel resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Albright</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/03/the-camera-vs-the-eye/comment-page-1#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Albright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.03.14/the-camera-vs-the-eye#comment-376</guid>
		<description>I have been reading a lot of your blog posts this evening. Thanks for taking the time to write all these. I really enjoyed this post, its exactly the kind of thing I love to ponder over. Your technical articles are great as well... I&#039;ve been checking mtf charts for all my lenses, and tossing out my cheap filters. Thanks again,.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading a lot of your blog posts this evening. Thanks for taking the time to write all these. I really enjoyed this post, its exactly the kind of thing I love to ponder over. Your technical articles are great as well&#8230; I&#8217;ve been checking mtf charts for all my lenses, and tossing out my cheap filters. Thanks again,.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
