<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controlling Depth of Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/04/controlling-depth-of-field/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/04/controlling-depth-of-field</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/04/controlling-depth-of-field/comment-page-1#comment-26265</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.04.05/controlling-depth-of-field#comment-26265</guid>
		<description>Q: Why would a photographer would zoom from 35mm to 85mm and then step back 30 feet to make the subject appear the same size in the sensor?

A: To include less of the background in the picture.

No?  Just saying - I&#039;m no physicist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: Why would a photographer would zoom from 35mm to 85mm and then step back 30 feet to make the subject appear the same size in the sensor?</p>
<p>A: To include less of the background in the picture.</p>
<p>No?  Just saying &#8211; I&#8217;m no physicist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feng Chun</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/04/controlling-depth-of-field/comment-page-1#comment-25791</link>
		<dc:creator>Feng Chun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.04.05/controlling-depth-of-field#comment-25791</guid>
		<description>Interesting enough, regarding the basic rule 3 of DOP, Canon has a different opinion:
&quot;You will usually choose the focal length to suit the subject rather than to suit the depth-of-field. However, the accepted rule is that you get more depth-of-field with wideangle lenses than with telephoto lenses. In fact, this rule is misleading. What actually happens is that a wideangle lens magnifies the subject less than a telephoto lens, which means that more of the image appears sharper. A simple test will show that if you take two photographs of the same subject from the same position with a wideangle and a telephoto focal length, then enlarge the centre of the wideangle image to match the view of the telephoto image, the depth-of-field will be identical. &quot;

Quoted from: http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/education/infobank/depth_of_field/depth_of_field.do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting enough, regarding the basic rule 3 of DOP, Canon has a different opinion:<br />
&#8220;You will usually choose the focal length to suit the subject rather than to suit the depth-of-field. However, the accepted rule is that you get more depth-of-field with wideangle lenses than with telephoto lenses. In fact, this rule is misleading. What actually happens is that a wideangle lens magnifies the subject less than a telephoto lens, which means that more of the image appears sharper. A simple test will show that if you take two photographs of the same subject from the same position with a wideangle and a telephoto focal length, then enlarge the centre of the wideangle image to match the view of the telephoto image, the depth-of-field will be identical. &#8221;</p>
<p>Quoted from: <a href="http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/education/infobank/depth_of_field/depth_of_field.do" rel="nofollow">http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/education/infobank/depth_of_field/depth_of_field.do</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael THornton</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/04/controlling-depth-of-field/comment-page-1#comment-16251</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael THornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2009.04.05/controlling-depth-of-field#comment-16251</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger,
Regarding your comments on Hyperfocal distance charts
Since buying a Nikon D800 I find that the old standard COC of 30 no longer works.
I did read that the COC should be twice the size of the sensor pitch, in the case of the D800 2 x 4.7 = COC of 10
Readjusting the charts to use this  COC of 10 results in much sharper images, the downside being that the DOF is now really restricted for landscape use. I suppose thats the penalty of using hi res sensors?

Regards
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger,<br />
Regarding your comments on Hyperfocal distance charts<br />
Since buying a Nikon D800 I find that the old standard COC of 30 no longer works.<br />
I did read that the COC should be twice the size of the sensor pitch, in the case of the D800 2 x 4.7 = COC of 10<br />
Readjusting the charts to use this  COC of 10 results in much sharper images, the downside being that the DOF is now really restricted for landscape use. I suppose thats the penalty of using hi res sensors?</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
