<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Broad Guide to Ultra Wide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-25437</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-25437</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Roger, especially for the first section of the post.I finally found what I&#039;ve been looking for: that the 4mm between a 12 and a 16mm lens can make quite a bit of a difference. But now I&#039;m wondering if it makes sense to go for the Sigma 12-24 instead of the Nikon 16-35 f4 as I had planned (to use on my d600). There are a lot of trade-off factors between the two, price being one (though not the most important for me), the others being speed, IS, build quality, and the possibility to use ordinary filters. On all of these (except for price, of course) the Sigma looses. It probably looses in image quality too, but I&#039;m not sure. In any case, it wins in terms of price and field of view. Oh, and Nikon also wins in terms of range (which, I think makes it usable more widely).

I&#039;d be interested to hear your opinion on this. Which would you prefer (and why)? And what are customers choosing most of the time?

I kniw you might say it all depends on your needs and preferences, but any reflections on the matt would be highly appreciated. I am not a pro, so I might be missing some basic arguments... All I know is that I keep bumping against the lower end of my nikon 28-300 and I want a lens to overcome that limitation and I don&#039;t want the same to happen with the next lens, but neither do I want to be disappointed by the image quality so that I would revert to the 28mm Nikon anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Roger, especially for the first section of the post.I finally found what I&#8217;ve been looking for: that the 4mm between a 12 and a 16mm lens can make quite a bit of a difference. But now I&#8217;m wondering if it makes sense to go for the Sigma 12-24 instead of the Nikon 16-35 f4 as I had planned (to use on my d600). There are a lot of trade-off factors between the two, price being one (though not the most important for me), the others being speed, IS, build quality, and the possibility to use ordinary filters. On all of these (except for price, of course) the Sigma looses. It probably looses in image quality too, but I&#8217;m not sure. In any case, it wins in terms of price and field of view. Oh, and Nikon also wins in terms of range (which, I think makes it usable more widely).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to hear your opinion on this. Which would you prefer (and why)? And what are customers choosing most of the time?</p>
<p>I kniw you might say it all depends on your needs and preferences, but any reflections on the matt would be highly appreciated. I am not a pro, so I might be missing some basic arguments&#8230; All I know is that I keep bumping against the lower end of my nikon 28-300 and I want a lens to overcome that limitation and I don&#8217;t want the same to happen with the next lens, but neither do I want to be disappointed by the image quality so that I would revert to the 28mm Nikon anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>Thanks Roger. I have a Tokina 11-16mm on the way and finding this before hand has probably saved me tons of wasted pixels and missed opportunities. Super job of making the concepts very understandable. It was also nice to see your enthusiastic recommendation of the lens in a follow-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Roger. I have a Tokina 11-16mm on the way and finding this before hand has probably saved me tons of wasted pixels and missed opportunities. Super job of making the concepts very understandable. It was also nice to see your enthusiastic recommendation of the lens in a follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>Just found this and timing is right on. I am getting a 10 - 22 mm for Xmas for my 7D and your excellent explanation will help my understand of wide angle photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found this and timing is right on. I am getting a 10 &#8211; 22 mm for Xmas for my 7D and your excellent explanation will help my understand of wide angle photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>Great explanations and visuals. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanations and visuals. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Teo</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Teo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>Thanks,  Very useful tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,  Very useful tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chirag</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>A very interesting guide indeed. It would be very useful for people like me who have just bought an ultra-wide lens. I bought the NIKKOR 10-24mm. I read your write-up before buying and after buying. Will read many more times to better utilize the lens. Thanks once again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting guide indeed. It would be very useful for people like me who have just bought an ultra-wide lens. I bought the NIKKOR 10-24mm. I read your write-up before buying and after buying. Will read many more times to better utilize the lens. Thanks once again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>A really interesting and comprehensive guide to wide angles!
Fantastic amount of information and great pictures to prove your points!

Just one advise: you should separate your business blog and the guides. It&#039;s pretty hard to find other useful posts if I&#039;m not interested in renting a lens :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting and comprehensive guide to wide angles!<br />
Fantastic amount of information and great pictures to prove your points!</p>
<p>Just one advise: you should separate your business blog and the guides. It&#8217;s pretty hard to find other useful posts if I&#8217;m not interested in renting a lens <img src='http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-788</guid>
		<description>The Tokina would be my first choice: very nice lens. A touch soft wide open but very sharp at f3.5 and useful even completely wide open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tokina would be my first choice: very nice lens. A touch soft wide open but very sharp at f3.5 and useful even completely wide open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunal</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Hi. I think that is an excellent article and essential for beginners like me. Read it a few times already. I need to buy a wide angle lens which is reasonably sharp and with the capability of capturing images of stars. Can you help me with a rough idea. Is the tokina 11-16mm f2.8 ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I think that is an excellent article and essential for beginners like me. Read it a few times already. I need to buy a wide angle lens which is reasonably sharp and with the capability of capturing images of stars. Can you help me with a rough idea. Is the tokina 11-16mm f2.8 ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2010/02/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide/comment-page-1#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2010.02.13/a-broad-guide-to-ultra-wide#comment-748</guid>
		<description>This is just the information I needed now that I&#039;ve purchased a Sigma 10-20mm lens for my Sony A700 (APS-C) camera. Thanks very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the information I needed now that I&#8217;ve purchased a Sigma 10-20mm lens for my Sony A700 (APS-C) camera. Thanks very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
