<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Lenses for Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Richy Lacey</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-38685</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy Lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-38685</guid>
		<description>The Tamron 17-50/2.8 I own definitely isn&#039;t parfocal. There are fairly dramatic shifts in focus between wide and long. Or at least there were until the zoom ring broke...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tamron 17-50/2.8 I own definitely isn&#8217;t parfocal. There are fairly dramatic shifts in focus between wide and long. Or at least there were until the zoom ring broke&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-30532</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-30532</guid>
		<description>The new EF 24-70mm 4L IS is parfocal -(at least very close).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new EF 24-70mm 4L IS is parfocal -(at least very close).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawes</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-24561</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-24561</guid>
		<description>So... this list does not apply when using full frame cameras? What about smaller sensors above 2/3&quot; like APS-C?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; this list does not apply when using full frame cameras? What about smaller sensors above 2/3&#8243; like APS-C?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-13154</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-13154</guid>
		<description>This article is now a bit dated and I just want to point out to everyone that lenses that appeared parfocal on a camera with, say, a 2/3&quot; sensor may show themselves WAAAAYYYYY not parfocal when you&#039;re filming on a full-frame sensor. Depth of field is dramatically different nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is now a bit dated and I just want to point out to everyone that lenses that appeared parfocal on a camera with, say, a 2/3&#8243; sensor may show themselves WAAAAYYYYY not parfocal when you&#8217;re filming on a full-frame sensor. Depth of field is dramatically different nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Rabin</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-13143</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Rabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-13143</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that any of the 4 Canon 70-200 zooms are parfocal. At least that is what I have read in several articles. Also the 24-105 is varifocal but minimal OOF issues compared to other Canon L Glass like the 24-70</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that any of the 4 Canon 70-200 zooms are parfocal. At least that is what I have read in several articles. Also the 24-105 is varifocal but minimal OOF issues compared to other Canon L Glass like the 24-70</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Brinson</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Brinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-8226</guid>
		<description>Tamron 17-50 2.8 and Sigma 50-150 2.8 are parafocal and work well for video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamron 17-50 2.8 and Sigma 50-150 2.8 are parafocal and work well for video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-6982</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-6982</guid>
		<description>Eugene,

I&#039;m not sure where you got that - the article doesn&#039;t have anything about compatibility in it. The Sigma 12-24 (both versions) are certainly compatible with the 5D II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you got that &#8211; the article doesn&#8217;t have anything about compatibility in it. The Sigma 12-24 (both versions) are certainly compatible with the 5D II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-6977</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-6977</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think 24-105mm is parfocal but it changes focus very little with the zoom so as far as video it could be considered as parfocal. Nevertheless it does change focus with the zoom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think 24-105mm is parfocal but it changes focus very little with the zoom so as far as video it could be considered as parfocal. Nevertheless it does change focus with the zoom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-6976</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-6976</guid>
		<description>I guess according to you Sigma 12-24mm (both versions) is not compatible with my 5D2.
What a shame I guess I have to put it on the shelf and just enjoy looking at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess according to you Sigma 12-24mm (both versions) is not compatible with my 5D2.<br />
What a shame I guess I have to put it on the shelf and just enjoy looking at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoxication</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/02/photo-lenses-for-video/comment-page-1#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoxication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:6081/news/2011.02.08/photo-lenses-for-video#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>I can also attest to the fact that the 24-105L is parfocal.  The zoom/focus rings are a bit tight to turn, we&#039;ll see how this changes once I use it a bit more over the years.  Definitely a keeper, even though there is a bit of barrel/pincushion distortion throughout it&#039;s range.  Sharp wide open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can also attest to the fact that the 24-105L is parfocal.  The zoom/focus rings are a bit tight to turn, we&#8217;ll see how this changes once I use it a bit more over the years.  Definitely a keeper, even though there is a bit of barrel/pincushion distortion throughout it&#8217;s range.  Sharp wide open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
