<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rapple 4000 (or Roger designs the perfect camera)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Find out more</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-30029</link>
		<dc:creator>Find out more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-30029</guid>
		<description>Quick recommendation.... more photos and video clips 
in upcoming articles. Massive blocks of text injure my sight and I hate it, lol.
Wall of text strikes for 4500 damage.... lol. This joke never ever gets 
old. Good content though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick recommendation&#8230;. more photos and video clips<br />
in upcoming articles. Massive blocks of text injure my sight and I hate it, lol.<br />
Wall of text strikes for 4500 damage&#8230;. lol. This joke never ever gets<br />
old. Good content though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t, but obviously I like their ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t, but obviously I like their ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>The whole point of a camera for photographers, is control.  Making a shiny glorified pinhole camera that images onto a sensor the size of a grain of salt, but uses &quot;apps&quot; to take pictures or make them look &quot;good&quot;, is something people who take snapshots need.  It&#039;s not what photographers need.  Physics is physics.  Air molecules, and light photons don&#039;t shrink.  

Microsizing is something that will always compromise the performance and control of a camera.

When an iPhone has a zoom lens that is a constant f/1.4 arperture, with a full frame equivalent focal length zoom range of 14mm to 500mm...whose gigantic elements are comprised of forcefields that are weightless and optically perfect...that get projected out in front of the camera...engaged by thought control...and another forcefield holds the iPhone to your eye (viewed through an optical eyepiece that also employs projected forcefield mirrors) and follows wherever you look...and images onto a sensor the size of the touchscreen...all this for a data package costing only $10 a month...that never drops calls...ONLY THEN WILL I BE IMPRESSED by a phone camera.

Otherwise, we are just talking overpriced gobbledygook, personal electronic bling...nothing more.  Certainly not a real tool for real photographers! 

As I said before, Apple is sitting on well over $70 billion in cash.  They are a greedy corporation.  They need to do their &quot;fair share&quot; and spread the wealth around...&quot;gift&quot; it to the treasury to help bring down the deficit...so Obama can go stand in front of another rusty bridge somewhere, and fix it with his rainbows and unicorns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole point of a camera for photographers, is control.  Making a shiny glorified pinhole camera that images onto a sensor the size of a grain of salt, but uses &#8220;apps&#8221; to take pictures or make them look &#8220;good&#8221;, is something people who take snapshots need.  It&#8217;s not what photographers need.  Physics is physics.  Air molecules, and light photons don&#8217;t shrink.  </p>
<p>Microsizing is something that will always compromise the performance and control of a camera.</p>
<p>When an iPhone has a zoom lens that is a constant f/1.4 arperture, with a full frame equivalent focal length zoom range of 14mm to 500mm&#8230;whose gigantic elements are comprised of forcefields that are weightless and optically perfect&#8230;that get projected out in front of the camera&#8230;engaged by thought control&#8230;and another forcefield holds the iPhone to your eye (viewed through an optical eyepiece that also employs projected forcefield mirrors) and follows wherever you look&#8230;and images onto a sensor the size of the touchscreen&#8230;all this for a data package costing only $10 a month&#8230;that never drops calls&#8230;ONLY THEN WILL I BE IMPRESSED by a phone camera.</p>
<p>Otherwise, we are just talking overpriced gobbledygook, personal electronic bling&#8230;nothing more.  Certainly not a real tool for real photographers! </p>
<p>As I said before, Apple is sitting on well over $70 billion in cash.  They are a greedy corporation.  They need to do their &#8220;fair share&#8221; and spread the wealth around&#8230;&#8221;gift&#8221; it to the treasury to help bring down the deficit&#8230;so Obama can go stand in front of another rusty bridge somewhere, and fix it with his rainbows and unicorns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Have you seen this concept camera? http://www.artefactgroup.com/wvil/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen this concept camera? <a href="http://www.artefactgroup.com/wvil/" rel="nofollow">http://www.artefactgroup.com/wvil/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Promit</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Promit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 04:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Apple products. But I immensely respect the design that goes into them, and I had this discussion recently with a friend while doing some white-board pie in the sky engineering work along the same lines. (I think you&#039;re not ambitious enough in the design, btw. This camera is reasonably competent boredom.)

Truth is, I don&#039;t think Apple would produce a camera anything like this. SLR? Interchangeable lenses? These are almost offensively crude for the Apple world. No, the camera Apple would design would look a lot like a Leica X1 I think. Quality would ooze from every last piece of the system, massively trumping flexibility and control in every case. Apple is about doing one thing and doing it incredibly, violently better than everyone. An Apple camera would be zero involvement, point and click that would turn up amazing images. It would let you select nothing about the photo, because Apple has already put a lot of effort into making the correct decisions for you. (Look at the Camera app across four generations of iPhone. Even the iPad.)

And if you&#039;re designing your own camera, from the ground up, to really change cameras? Throw out the SLR mechanisms (go mirrorless) and start with more generalized computing hardware (ARM/PowerVR based programmable app platforms). There&#039;s no real point to making buttons or dials for a specific purpose either (think NEX soft buttons but done a bit more carefully).

If you really do this right from the ground up engineering and design, everyone will be able to love the camera without having to specifically add the exact features everyone wants. There&#039;s a (camera-)app for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Apple products. But I immensely respect the design that goes into them, and I had this discussion recently with a friend while doing some white-board pie in the sky engineering work along the same lines. (I think you&#8217;re not ambitious enough in the design, btw. This camera is reasonably competent boredom.)</p>
<p>Truth is, I don&#8217;t think Apple would produce a camera anything like this. SLR? Interchangeable lenses? These are almost offensively crude for the Apple world. No, the camera Apple would design would look a lot like a Leica X1 I think. Quality would ooze from every last piece of the system, massively trumping flexibility and control in every case. Apple is about doing one thing and doing it incredibly, violently better than everyone. An Apple camera would be zero involvement, point and click that would turn up amazing images. It would let you select nothing about the photo, because Apple has already put a lot of effort into making the correct decisions for you. (Look at the Camera app across four generations of iPhone. Even the iPad.)</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re designing your own camera, from the ground up, to really change cameras? Throw out the SLR mechanisms (go mirrorless) and start with more generalized computing hardware (ARM/PowerVR based programmable app platforms). There&#8217;s no real point to making buttons or dials for a specific purpose either (think NEX soft buttons but done a bit more carefully).</p>
<p>If you really do this right from the ground up engineering and design, everyone will be able to love the camera without having to specifically add the exact features everyone wants. There&#8217;s a (camera-)app for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>Why not add voice control? I can yell at my car and my phone, why not my camera - &quot;ISO 400&quot;, &quot;Shutterspeed Priority&quot; etc. You could ditch a load of dial and menus at a stroke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not add voice control? I can yell at my car and my phone, why not my camera &#8211; &#8220;ISO 400&#8243;, &#8220;Shutterspeed Priority&#8221; etc. You could ditch a load of dial and menus at a stroke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>The Rapple-dapple sounds like something Tim was craving in the NEX line... perhaps the peaking mode was all that was missing from the first generation. 

I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t include a CCD sensor with live view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rapple-dapple sounds like something Tim was craving in the NEX line&#8230; perhaps the peaking mode was all that was missing from the first generation. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t include a CCD sensor with live view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Saxon</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Saxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>Several bits, the higher-quality screen, interchangeable mount, &amp; reverse engineering focus algorithms, for instance, remind me a lot of Epic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several bits, the higher-quality screen, interchangeable mount, &amp; reverse engineering focus algorithms, for instance, remind me a lot of Epic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Samuel, isn&#039;t something similar to that already used by cinematographers?  That wouldn&#039;t be very useful without the rig holding the camera, or for still shot photography, it seems to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel, isn&#8217;t something similar to that already used by cinematographers?  That wouldn&#8217;t be very useful without the rig holding the camera, or for still shot photography, it seems to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Hurtado</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-rapple-4000-or-what-wont-be-announced-next-week/comment-page-1#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Hurtado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=2908#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>eyepiece: maybe we can go for an SLT with a big, fast, high-res EVF that can be separated from the body (except for the cable) and placed anywhere around it with a friction arm mounted on the hot shoe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eyepiece: maybe we can go for an SLT with a big, fast, high-res EVF that can be separated from the body (except for the cable) and placed anywhere around it with a friction arm mounted on the hot shoe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
