<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lens Genealogy &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: http://tinyurl.com/famiglynn47703</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-27621</link>
		<dc:creator>http://tinyurl.com/famiglynn47703</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-27621</guid>
		<description>“LensRentals.com - Lens Genealogy - Part 2” ended up being a relatively 
pleasant posting, . I hope you keep posting and I&#039;ll try to keep reading! Thanks ,Bailey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“LensRentals.com &#8211; Lens Genealogy &#8211; Part 2” ended up being a relatively<br />
pleasant posting, . I hope you keep posting and I&#8217;ll try to keep reading! Thanks ,Bailey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-24144</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-24144</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger! Thank you for the good lens genealogy. It makes the matter much more systematic and clear. But.. You almoust completely avoid Triplet – Ernostar – Sonnar thread. Even no scheme of famous Zeiss Sonnar... Of course it mostly related to Rangefinder era of photography but it was very important part of lens history / chronology. Can I ask you to… add it? May be as Part III? Or update Triplet chapter? Please… With this part genealogy will look perfect!  Thank you in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger! Thank you for the good lens genealogy. It makes the matter much more systematic and clear. But.. You almoust completely avoid Triplet – Ernostar – Sonnar thread. Even no scheme of famous Zeiss Sonnar&#8230; Of course it mostly related to Rangefinder era of photography but it was very important part of lens history / chronology. Can I ask you to… add it? May be as Part III? Or update Triplet chapter? Please… With this part genealogy will look perfect!  Thank you in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>Roger,  
 Thanks for the very informative article(s).  An obvious question seems to be why no one has designed an SLR camera where the mirror is hinged in the front and swings down so as not to 
interfere with the lens.  I guess there would be complications from moving the film/sensor plane back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,<br />
 Thanks for the very informative article(s).  An obvious question seems to be why no one has designed an SLR camera where the mirror is hinged in the front and swings down so as not to<br />
interfere with the lens.  I guess there would be complications from moving the film/sensor plane back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>Joel,

I&#039;m not certain of the answer to that. Most of the time it&#039;s a decision on whether it&#039;s worth the cost, etc. But in the case of the 50mm you mention or certain other primes, it would seem adding an IS group would interfere to some degree with the original layout of the lens if it&#039;s symmetrical. 

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain of the answer to that. Most of the time it&#8217;s a decision on whether it&#8217;s worth the cost, etc. But in the case of the 50mm you mention or certain other primes, it would seem adding an IS group would interfere to some degree with the original layout of the lens if it&#8217;s symmetrical. </p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>Roger, one other general question - does lens genealogy also account for the inclusion or exclusion of image stabilization (IS) in certain classes of lenses?  For example, you can readily find a 17-50mm or 70-200mm zoom with IS, but apparently nobody makes a 50mm prime with IS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger, one other general question &#8211; does lens genealogy also account for the inclusion or exclusion of image stabilization (IS) in certain classes of lenses?  For example, you can readily find a 17-50mm or 70-200mm zoom with IS, but apparently nobody makes a 50mm prime with IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,

You are correct on all the assumptions above! Although the teleconverter on a zoom thing is more than just the telephoto design. 

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,</p>
<p>You are correct on all the assumptions above! Although the teleconverter on a zoom thing is more than just the telephoto design. </p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2241</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2241</guid>
		<description>Roger, excellent and enlightening article.

A related question - I have a Kenko 1.4x teleconverter, and I know from here and other sources that it will work pretty well on long primes and zooms, not so well on standard zooms and wide angle lenses.  Is this a result of teleconverters being designed to work best with Telephoto design lenses?  And could I reasonably extrapolate that my 1.4x will tend to work better with the Canon 85mm f1.8 (Telephoto) than with the Canon 85mm f1.2L (Double Gauss)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger, excellent and enlightening article.</p>
<p>A related question &#8211; I have a Kenko 1.4x teleconverter, and I know from here and other sources that it will work pretty well on long primes and zooms, not so well on standard zooms and wide angle lenses.  Is this a result of teleconverters being designed to work best with Telephoto design lenses?  And could I reasonably extrapolate that my 1.4x will tend to work better with the Canon 85mm f1.8 (Telephoto) than with the Canon 85mm f1.2L (Double Gauss)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>Wow -- very interesting reading, extremely well done so as to be comprehensible (to a degree) to those of us who are interested but have no background per se in optics.  Thank you so much for taking the time to do this!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8212; very interesting reading, extremely well done so as to be comprehensible (to a degree) to those of us who are interested but have no background per se in optics.  Thank you so much for taking the time to do this!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Byrnes</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Byrnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>Very interesting Roger, but who knew that Carl Zeiss invented the Teletubbies? Knew there was a reason I love all things Zeiss....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting Roger, but who knew that Carl Zeiss invented the Teletubbies? Knew there was a reason I love all things Zeiss&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluto</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/09/lens-genealogy-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-2089</link>
		<dc:creator>bluto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=3083#comment-2089</guid>
		<description>When dealing with telephoto and reverse telephotos, the rear groups are frequently derived from one of the other 4 designs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When dealing with telephoto and reverse telephotos, the rear groups are frequently derived from one of the other 4 designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
