<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on Reflections. Coatings: The Most Important Part of Your Lens.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>Coating a couple of surfaces would help, but since they have to take the lens apart to coat the elements, it shouldn&#039;t be any more difficult to coat them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coating a couple of surfaces would help, but since they have to take the lens apart to coat the elements, it shouldn&#8217;t be any more difficult to coat them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>Great read Roger! Thanks! I for one have an old Xenon lens that is beautiful but lacks any coating. I have been looking into having the elements coated but have been told different things about what this would accomplish. I would mostly just want to see more contrast overall and possibly less ghosting in specific situations. One person told me I would need to coat 80% of the surfaces to have an impact on picture quality and another said just coating front element would make a significant difference. 

Would coating one or two surfaces make an impact on my lens? If so how do I know which surface(s)!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read Roger! Thanks! I for one have an old Xenon lens that is beautiful but lacks any coating. I have been looking into having the elements coated but have been told different things about what this would accomplish. I would mostly just want to see more contrast overall and possibly less ghosting in specific situations. One person told me I would need to coat 80% of the surfaces to have an impact on picture quality and another said just coating front element would make a significant difference. </p>
<p>Would coating one or two surfaces make an impact on my lens? If so how do I know which surface(s)!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heru Anggono</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Heru Anggono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>I guess it&#039;s time to consider the ultimate lens filter, which is no filter at all. Less is more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s time to consider the ultimate lens filter, which is no filter at all. Less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>WildBill, 

It definitely is cost. But I&#039;ll also add the nanocoatings seem soft - we&#039;ve had two lenses come back from repair ruined because a tech tried to clean the nanocoatings. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s universal or not (and I&#039;m not going to experiment to find out).

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WildBill, </p>
<p>It definitely is cost. But I&#8217;ll also add the nanocoatings seem soft &#8211; we&#8217;ve had two lenses come back from repair ruined because a tech tried to clean the nanocoatings. I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s universal or not (and I&#8217;m not going to experiment to find out).</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WildBill</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>WildBill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger, 
   Thank you for the very informative and interesting article.  I first read it on the Canon Rumors site.  
   After reading the article I have a question.  You state that nano-coatings can only be used on one or two lens elements, but you don&#039;t explain what the restriction is that limits it&#039;s use.  My guess would be cost but since you didn&#039;t explicitly tell us, I figured I would ask.  Is it a cost factor or is there so physical interaction between multiple nano-coated layers that make it impractical.
   Thanks again for the excellent article.
WildBill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger,<br />
   Thank you for the very informative and interesting article.  I first read it on the Canon Rumors site.<br />
   After reading the article I have a question.  You state that nano-coatings can only be used on one or two lens elements, but you don&#8217;t explain what the restriction is that limits it&#8217;s use.  My guess would be cost but since you didn&#8217;t explicitly tell us, I figured I would ask.  Is it a cost factor or is there so physical interaction between multiple nano-coated layers that make it impractical.<br />
   Thanks again for the excellent article.<br />
WildBill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>Just want to say thanks for all the great info you pass along to the community. Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to say thanks for all the great info you pass along to the community. Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>Nicholas,

I think coatings are certainly part of what you and I have noticed in old lenses, but design counts some too, especially in wider aperture lenses. Spherical aberrations are common in older designs, for example. The resolve quite well, those older lenses, but without the accutance (contrast) we are use to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas,</p>
<p>I think coatings are certainly part of what you and I have noticed in old lenses, but design counts some too, especially in wider aperture lenses. Spherical aberrations are common in older designs, for example. The resolve quite well, those older lenses, but without the accutance (contrast) we are use to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoof</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>Another aspect of coatings is that coatings are one of the major factors in the &quot;look&quot; of an image (for example, the &quot;Zeiss&quot; look), as least the &quot;look&quot; of the photos made with the lens.  This has to do with the fact that different coatings work on different light frequencies differently.  Coatings from the 1970&#039;s, for example, tended to yield a yellow &quot;cast&quot; onto pictures, because they were less effective on the non-yellow colors.  The better lenses tend to have better transmission curves across the frequency spectrum, primarily due to the coatings.  So not only is this important for glare, reflections, etc, but in the &quot;color tint&quot; of the lens, as well as being the major factor in the &quot;look&quot; of the images made with the lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another aspect of coatings is that coatings are one of the major factors in the &#8220;look&#8221; of an image (for example, the &#8220;Zeiss&#8221; look), as least the &#8220;look&#8221; of the photos made with the lens.  This has to do with the fact that different coatings work on different light frequencies differently.  Coatings from the 1970&#8242;s, for example, tended to yield a yellow &#8220;cast&#8221; onto pictures, because they were less effective on the non-yellow colors.  The better lenses tend to have better transmission curves across the frequency spectrum, primarily due to the coatings.  So not only is this important for glare, reflections, etc, but in the &#8220;color tint&#8221; of the lens, as well as being the major factor in the &#8220;look&#8221; of the images made with the lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Condon</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Condon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>This was a very nice article about a terribly underappreciated aspect of lenses. I particularly liked some of your intuitive descriptions of the coatings.

I have mucked around with older lenses (from roughly 1955-1980) on adapters a bit, and I found many of them to be severely wanting for contrast compared to modern lenses; my tendency is to blame this on the coatings, since coating technology has advanced a great deal over the past few decades. You have a great deal more knowledge of old lenses than I do; is this your impression as well?

Although it&#039;s less relevant to photography, I&#039;ll note that thin film coatings can also be used to make mirrors of various sorts, including those that are highly reflective at one wavelength and highly transmissive at another; such mirrors are absolutely critical for constructing and working with lasers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very nice article about a terribly underappreciated aspect of lenses. I particularly liked some of your intuitive descriptions of the coatings.</p>
<p>I have mucked around with older lenses (from roughly 1955-1980) on adapters a bit, and I found many of them to be severely wanting for contrast compared to modern lenses; my tendency is to blame this on the coatings, since coating technology has advanced a great deal over the past few decades. You have a great deal more knowledge of old lenses than I do; is this your impression as well?</p>
<p>Although it&#8217;s less relevant to photography, I&#8217;ll note that thin film coatings can also be used to make mirrors of various sorts, including those that are highly reflective at one wavelength and highly transmissive at another; such mirrors are absolutely critical for constructing and working with lasers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/reflections-on-reflections-the-most-important-part-of-your-lens/comment-page-1#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4615#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>Fab! Your writings are a valuable resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fab! Your writings are a valuable resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
