<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Important Developments in Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: gandalfii</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-5097</link>
		<dc:creator>gandalfii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-5097</guid>
		<description>Cameras have been around for 1000 years, using a pinhole to cast an image (which could be traced) on a wall or paper.  This is what Clarke had in ming when he discovered Great Falls in about 1803 and said &quot;I wish I had a camera.&quot;  Similarly, it has been known for hundreds of years that silver chloride turns to metallic silver in the presence of light.  The critical photographic development (pun intended; the earliest photos had no developer) was the invention of fixer, which allows a photograph to be viewed without continuing to darken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameras have been around for 1000 years, using a pinhole to cast an image (which could be traced) on a wall or paper.  This is what Clarke had in ming when he discovered Great Falls in about 1803 and said &#8220;I wish I had a camera.&#8221;  Similarly, it has been known for hundreds of years that silver chloride turns to metallic silver in the presence of light.  The critical photographic development (pun intended; the earliest photos had no developer) was the invention of fixer, which allows a photograph to be viewed without continuing to darken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>Oh, forgot to say the most important thing:

Roger Cicala: thank you so much for all these articles. During the last days I&#039;ve spent endless fascinating hour reading your photography blog articles. They have all been interesting, but the camera and lens history parts have been just the best! Thank you so much for writing these excellent articles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, forgot to say the most important thing:</p>
<p>Roger Cicala: thank you so much for all these articles. During the last days I&#8217;ve spent endless fascinating hour reading your photography blog articles. They have all been interesting, but the camera and lens history parts have been just the best! Thank you so much for writing these excellent articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Carl, you write a lot but say little. The truth of it is, Bayer sensor users, myself included, have had 20+ megapixels on our 35 mm cameras since 2008. The new, impressive 15 megasite sensor from Sigma is finally becoming affordable, but starting with Nikon D800, Bayer sensor cameras are moving into the 40 megapixel realm. For those people interested in the image quality across the image at a given print size instead of just looking at single pixels (which is utterly irrelevant), Bayer has given and still gives better resolution, dynamic range, and high ISO.

As for Foveon sensor theory: Foveon advertisement material shows a sensor where one layer captures pure blue, one pure green and one pure red colour. Unfortunately, this isn&#039;t the truth. The topmost layer catches all wavelengths, but blue a bit more than the others. The next catches a bit more green than other wavelengths, and the bottom one pretty much the rest. This is a far cry from the clean colour separation you get with a Bayer filter. So, while Bayer is wasteful of photons, Foveon gives muted, unclean colours in the RAW file (and NO, I am NOT saying that you would ever see these brown colours in an actual photo: see below).

So the three elements in the Foveon sensor receive raw data that is far from &quot;pure red, green, blue&quot;. What follows is that colour separation has to be increased in RAW-&gt;JPEG / RAW-&gt;screen processing, and this is what causes colour noise and colour blotches at high ISO. This data is the result of both of what I have seen and from discussions with a guy in our company who actually has designed a working 35 mm X-ray sensitive sensor all by himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, you write a lot but say little. The truth of it is, Bayer sensor users, myself included, have had 20+ megapixels on our 35 mm cameras since 2008. The new, impressive 15 megasite sensor from Sigma is finally becoming affordable, but starting with Nikon D800, Bayer sensor cameras are moving into the 40 megapixel realm. For those people interested in the image quality across the image at a given print size instead of just looking at single pixels (which is utterly irrelevant), Bayer has given and still gives better resolution, dynamic range, and high ISO.</p>
<p>As for Foveon sensor theory: Foveon advertisement material shows a sensor where one layer captures pure blue, one pure green and one pure red colour. Unfortunately, this isn&#8217;t the truth. The topmost layer catches all wavelengths, but blue a bit more than the others. The next catches a bit more green than other wavelengths, and the bottom one pretty much the rest. This is a far cry from the clean colour separation you get with a Bayer filter. So, while Bayer is wasteful of photons, Foveon gives muted, unclean colours in the RAW file (and NO, I am NOT saying that you would ever see these brown colours in an actual photo: see below).</p>
<p>So the three elements in the Foveon sensor receive raw data that is far from &#8220;pure red, green, blue&#8221;. What follows is that colour separation has to be increased in RAW-&gt;JPEG / RAW-&gt;screen processing, and this is what causes colour noise and colour blotches at high ISO. This data is the result of both of what I have seen and from discussions with a guy in our company who actually has designed a working 35 mm X-ray sensitive sensor all by himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-3326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-3326</guid>
		<description>So... If Fujis new pattern stands up to the test like the early samples indicates, will you be dropping number 18:Bayer filter-mosaic of the list soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; If Fujis new pattern stands up to the test like the early samples indicates, will you be dropping number 18:Bayer filter-mosaic of the list soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Schlotzhauer</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Schlotzhauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>Noticed there was no mention regading a significant &quot;turning point&quot; in photography - introduction of the dslr by Canon i.e. the D30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noticed there was no mention regading a significant &#8220;turning point&#8221; in photography &#8211; introduction of the dslr by Canon i.e. the D30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-2777</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger - 

May I humbly offer up one more innovation?   

Through The Lens (TTL) Flash Exposure Photography.

The Olympus OM-2 pioneered the Off-The-Film Metering system, which was initially designed by Minolta but licensed to Olympus (so they could do the real-world de-bugging of the system) and introduced in the OM-2.   While the auto exposure system worked well (they tinkered with really mod-art silver patterns on the shutter curtains before realizing that light reflecting off the film emulsion was good enough), it was the TTL Flash that was &quot;amazing&quot;!    

With TTL, the flash duration was determined by the camera&#039;s light meter watching the light of the flash coming through the camera&#039;s lens at the stopped-down shooting setting, and multiple flashes could be utilized, too.   We were all flabbergasted, especially us macro guys using bellows setups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger &#8211; </p>
<p>May I humbly offer up one more innovation?   </p>
<p>Through The Lens (TTL) Flash Exposure Photography.</p>
<p>The Olympus OM-2 pioneered the Off-The-Film Metering system, which was initially designed by Minolta but licensed to Olympus (so they could do the real-world de-bugging of the system) and introduced in the OM-2.   While the auto exposure system worked well (they tinkered with really mod-art silver patterns on the shutter curtains before realizing that light reflecting off the film emulsion was good enough), it was the TTL Flash that was &#8220;amazing&#8221;!    </p>
<p>With TTL, the flash duration was determined by the camera&#8217;s light meter watching the light of the flash coming through the camera&#8217;s lens at the stopped-down shooting setting, and multiple flashes could be utilized, too.   We were all flabbergasted, especially us macro guys using bellows setups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph Breitkopf</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Breitkopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>Good read. Of course there are some enabling technologies missing (NAND flash was mentioned), but the list is long enough as-is.

Here&#039;s my minor quibble for the &quot;who invented what&quot;:

Minolta brought autofocus to the mass market, but the Nikon F3 AF was available two years earlier, and multiple manufacturers had shown prototypes much earlier (E.g. Nikon: AF-Nikkor 4.5/80 on the Cicago Camera-Show 1971).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read. Of course there are some enabling technologies missing (NAND flash was mentioned), but the list is long enough as-is.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my minor quibble for the &#8220;who invented what&#8221;:</p>
<p>Minolta brought autofocus to the mass market, but the Nikon F3 AF was available two years earlier, and multiple manufacturers had shown prototypes much earlier (E.g. Nikon: AF-Nikkor 4.5/80 on the Cicago Camera-Show 1971).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flavio Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>Flavio Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>I apologize for not having mentioned this earlier, but Daguerre did not invent the camera; he invented the daguerreotype.  Cameras existed as aids to drawing before Daguerre, but they were not really that useful because talented people could make drawings just fine without that crutch.  See this article http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/vermeer_camera_01.shtml.  Cameras are mechanical and optical, whereas Daguerre&#039;s invention was chemical in nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for not having mentioned this earlier, but Daguerre did not invent the camera; he invented the daguerreotype.  Cameras existed as aids to drawing before Daguerre, but they were not really that useful because talented people could make drawings just fine without that crutch.  See this article <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/vermeer_camera_01.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/vermeer_camera_01.shtml</a>.  Cameras are mechanical and optical, whereas Daguerre&#8217;s invention was chemical in nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>And one more consideration: Instant cameras (i.e. Polaroid), obsolete now, but imagine the DMV without them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one more consideration: Instant cameras (i.e. Polaroid), obsolete now, but imagine the DMV without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/12/the-most-important-developments-in-photography/comment-page-1#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=4687#comment-2760</guid>
		<description>In place of image stabilization (nice but far from necessary) I would put exposure metering and/or exposure automation. You could get away with experience/guessing in B&amp;W and color negative film, but color positive film requires correct exposure. Hand-held meters are good, but through the lens (TTL) exposures are even better most of the time. The Pentax Spotmatic showed the first prototype, but Topcon was the first production SLR camera with a TTL meter. Kodak had a camera in the late &#039;30&#039;s with a built-in meter, but it was for rich amateurs and not a big seller.

You might want to point out that film (i.e. getting past the collodion process) was a huge, major, vast improvement in photography and safety. Not only did the wet plate process require a portable darkroom (Matthew Brady had a specially built darkroom wagon which required two horses to pull), but collodion is a mixture of the explosive called gun cotton, mixed in the highly volatile, incredibly flammable chemical diethyl ether and flammable denatured alcohol-not the most user friendly ingredients! The explosions would have restricted photography to outdoor scenics-imagine the Secret Service letting the press photograph the president using a bunch of explosives and anesthetics, or having a portable darkroom filled with explosives and flammable materials on the sideline of a football game-the plates had to be used while wet, so you only had about 3 minutes from plate production to exposure.

Lastly, another consideration for your list. In 1959, Nikon (with the F) invented the first &#039;system&#039; camera, designed from the beginning to have interchangeable lenses, interchangeable finders, interchangeable backs (polaroid, motor, long roll), locking-up mirror, interchangable everything but the shutter. Not only was this stuff interchangeable, but it allowed the basic camera to be upgraded (finders advanced from no meter to external meters to multiple TTL meters) and thus not go obsolete.  Hasselblad, Canon, Mamaiya, Leica, and others eventually adopted all or most of these features, but it worked best in the Nikon F, as it was designed that way (no add-on reflex viewfinders as in the Leica Visoflex).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In place of image stabilization (nice but far from necessary) I would put exposure metering and/or exposure automation. You could get away with experience/guessing in B&amp;W and color negative film, but color positive film requires correct exposure. Hand-held meters are good, but through the lens (TTL) exposures are even better most of the time. The Pentax Spotmatic showed the first prototype, but Topcon was the first production SLR camera with a TTL meter. Kodak had a camera in the late &#8217;30&#8242;s with a built-in meter, but it was for rich amateurs and not a big seller.</p>
<p>You might want to point out that film (i.e. getting past the collodion process) was a huge, major, vast improvement in photography and safety. Not only did the wet plate process require a portable darkroom (Matthew Brady had a specially built darkroom wagon which required two horses to pull), but collodion is a mixture of the explosive called gun cotton, mixed in the highly volatile, incredibly flammable chemical diethyl ether and flammable denatured alcohol-not the most user friendly ingredients! The explosions would have restricted photography to outdoor scenics-imagine the Secret Service letting the press photograph the president using a bunch of explosives and anesthetics, or having a portable darkroom filled with explosives and flammable materials on the sideline of a football game-the plates had to be used while wet, so you only had about 3 minutes from plate production to exposure.</p>
<p>Lastly, another consideration for your list. In 1959, Nikon (with the F) invented the first &#8216;system&#8217; camera, designed from the beginning to have interchangeable lenses, interchangeable finders, interchangeable backs (polaroid, motor, long roll), locking-up mirror, interchangable everything but the shutter. Not only was this stuff interchangeable, but it allowed the basic camera to be upgraded (finders advanced from no meter to external meters to multiple TTL meters) and thus not go obsolete.  Hasselblad, Canon, Mamaiya, Leica, and others eventually adopted all or most of these features, but it worked best in the Nikon F, as it was designed that way (no add-on reflex viewfinders as in the Leica Visoflex).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
