<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imatest Macro Results (With Apologies to the Nikon 105 VR Micro)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-38363</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-38363</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious what the maximum resolution is possible on the canon. I.e, is the 1050 mark the limit of the lens or the camera ?
-
Like wise for the nikor is the 1300 mark a limit of the lens or the camera ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious what the maximum resolution is possible on the canon. I.e, is the 1050 mark the limit of the lens or the camera ?<br />
-<br />
Like wise for the nikor is the 1300 mark a limit of the lens or the camera ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nalahm</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-38339</link>
		<dc:creator>Nalahm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-38339</guid>
		<description>If your system is canon and need auto , the best is contax N 100/2.8 makro-sonnar converted to EF canon , nothing to deal if you need auto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your system is canon and need auto , the best is contax N 100/2.8 makro-sonnar converted to EF canon , nothing to deal if you need auto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nalahm</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-38338</link>
		<dc:creator>Nalahm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-38338</guid>
		<description>Best of the best for 1:1 macro is contax carl zeiss 100/4 makro S-planar. It come with tilt&amp;shift bellows that very useful for macro/products shot , nothing to compare if you can life with manual.
If you want to go further more than 5:1 , carl zeiss S-orthoplanar 60/4 is the best of this range in term of sharpness and color rendering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of the best for 1:1 macro is contax carl zeiss 100/4 makro S-planar. It come with tilt&amp;shift bellows that very useful for macro/products shot , nothing to compare if you can life with manual.<br />
If you want to go further more than 5:1 , carl zeiss S-orthoplanar 60/4 is the best of this range in term of sharpness and color rendering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jovic</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-38336</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-38336</guid>
		<description>As usual, nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-28189</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-28189</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this test. It would be very interesting to see how the Sigma 150mm f/2.8 OS performs on the Nikon D800(E). Besides: it is not clearly for me if this was the old Sigma 150 or the current one which is stabilzed (=&quot;EX DG OS APO&quot;).

It would be great if there also would be results for these lenses stopped down. Especially because they are for macro photos....

Of course it would be even more interesting to get the results at 1:1... 
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this test. It would be very interesting to see how the Sigma 150mm f/2.8 OS performs on the Nikon D800(E). Besides: it is not clearly for me if this was the old Sigma 150 or the current one which is stabilzed (=&#8221;EX DG OS APO&#8221;).</p>
<p>It would be great if there also would be results for these lenses stopped down. Especially because they are for macro photos&#8230;.</p>
<p>Of course it would be even more interesting to get the results at 1:1&#8230;<br />
 <img src='http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard George</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-26868</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-26868</guid>
		<description>Have you guys got a chance to test some other longer macros like the Nikkor 200mm f/4 or the Tamron 180mm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you guys got a chance to test some other longer macros like the Nikkor 200mm f/4 or the Tamron 180mm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Croubie</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-19960</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Croubie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-19960</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely interested in some &#039;classic&#039; macros, like the Olympus OM 20mm and 38mm, that is if you can figure out testing at 4x-12x mag (a 5x-mag battle between them and the MP-E 65 would be something i&#039;d pay to see).
(Also, a lot of people rave on about the Hassy and/or Contax 645 Makro-Planar 120mm, if you can afford one.)

Or even the older 100mm Canons, the USM-non-L and the non-USM are still widely available. And i&#039;d be very interested to know how they and other &#039;dedicated&#039; macro lenses go compared to &#039;regular&#039; lenses on tubes and/or reversed (i&#039;ve had good results with EF 100/2.0 on Kenko Tubes), and the old practice of &#039;enlarger lens on a lot of bellows&#039; would be a nice test too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely interested in some &#8216;classic&#8217; macros, like the Olympus OM 20mm and 38mm, that is if you can figure out testing at 4x-12x mag (a 5x-mag battle between them and the MP-E 65 would be something i&#8217;d pay to see).<br />
(Also, a lot of people rave on about the Hassy and/or Contax 645 Makro-Planar 120mm, if you can afford one.)</p>
<p>Or even the older 100mm Canons, the USM-non-L and the non-USM are still widely available. And i&#8217;d be very interested to know how they and other &#8216;dedicated&#8217; macro lenses go compared to &#8216;regular&#8217; lenses on tubes and/or reversed (i&#8217;ve had good results with EF 100/2.0 on Kenko Tubes), and the old practice of &#8216;enlarger lens on a lot of bellows&#8217; would be a nice test too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-16882</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-16882</guid>
		<description>The performance of the coastal Optics Lens was expected. Can you test it at a longer focus Distance? According to Jenoptik/Coastaloptics the performance should be even higher there. Thats really getting close to medium format resolutions, this lens deserves more attention. Imagine a bigger glass element tilt-version, the Zeiss hype works, this lens could start a new one. Thank you for the test!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The performance of the coastal Optics Lens was expected. Can you test it at a longer focus Distance? According to Jenoptik/Coastaloptics the performance should be even higher there. Thats really getting close to medium format resolutions, this lens deserves more attention. Imagine a bigger glass element tilt-version, the Zeiss hype works, this lens could start a new one. Thank you for the test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Herdman</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-16872</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Herdman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-16872</guid>
		<description>Canon 180mm f/2.8 L probably should be f/3.5.  But yeah, interesting results on the 180mm lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon 180mm f/2.8 L probably should be f/3.5.  But yeah, interesting results on the 180mm lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/07/imatest-macro-results-with-apologies-to-the-nikon-105-vr-micro/comment-page-1#comment-16587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 06:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8302#comment-16587</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the new Sigma 180 can&#039;t match the old Canon 180L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the new Sigma 180 can&#8217;t match the old Canon 180L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
