<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Search for the Perfect Micro 4/3 Zoom . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: LinhRom</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-19782</link>
		<dc:creator>LinhRom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-19782</guid>
		<description>i cracked off laughing (for obvious reason of course) when i read the part you wrote: &quot;One guy went so far as to say he owned over 50 lenses, and if I had his experience I wouldn’t limit myself&quot;

And it reminds me of this guy who complaining about the AF assist lamp position on the OM-D. As the way he handheld the lens block the beam. And he goes on saying hes a photographer with 40 years experience and holding a lens by grabbing on top of the barrel provide more stability and easier handling. 

Then i saw your photo on the blog, now, imagine that guy holding this lens like that. Well, what do i know, maybe he&#039;s as big and and strong as Arnold so it could be possible. 

Anyway, i read one of your article, and immediately hooked since I agree with everything you have to say. So I&#039;ve been reading every single article on this blog of yours. Simply amazing. Thanks so much for sharing Roger.  Keep up the good work please. 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i cracked off laughing (for obvious reason of course) when i read the part you wrote: &#8220;One guy went so far as to say he owned over 50 lenses, and if I had his experience I wouldn’t limit myself&#8221;</p>
<p>And it reminds me of this guy who complaining about the AF assist lamp position on the OM-D. As the way he handheld the lens block the beam. And he goes on saying hes a photographer with 40 years experience and holding a lens by grabbing on top of the barrel provide more stability and easier handling. </p>
<p>Then i saw your photo on the blog, now, imagine that guy holding this lens like that. Well, what do i know, maybe he&#8217;s as big and and strong as Arnold so it could be possible. </p>
<p>Anyway, i read one of your article, and immediately hooked since I agree with everything you have to say. So I&#8217;ve been reading every single article on this blog of yours. Simply amazing. Thanks so much for sharing Roger.  Keep up the good work please. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-18813</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-18813</guid>
		<description>HI Bart,

I think it must be a cost thing, or perhaps they think photographers wouldn&#039;t want such large shades. They&#039;re certainly effective!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Bart,</p>
<p>I think it must be a cost thing, or perhaps they think photographers wouldn&#8217;t want such large shades. They&#8217;re certainly effective!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-18812</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-18812</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger,

I apologize for going off topic so abruptly, but you are the most knowledgeable guy around so I have to ask: Do you know of a reason why most lens manufacturers won&#039;t ever use these black shades you see on the RED-lens? Would it not minimalize the amount of light that goes into the camera that falls not on the sensor, and therefore reduce unwanted reflections and glare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger,</p>
<p>I apologize for going off topic so abruptly, but you are the most knowledgeable guy around so I have to ask: Do you know of a reason why most lens manufacturers won&#8217;t ever use these black shades you see on the RED-lens? Would it not minimalize the amount of light that goes into the camera that falls not on the sensor, and therefore reduce unwanted reflections and glare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17437</guid>
		<description>I once saw a photo of an NEX-5 mounted to one of Leica&#039;s new Summilux-C cine primes.

The Summilux-C was smaller than this 18-85, but also much more expensive, so it&#039;s a matter of opinion whether that or this was crazier!

But both are awesome :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once saw a photo of an NEX-5 mounted to one of Leica&#8217;s new Summilux-C cine primes.</p>
<p>The Summilux-C was smaller than this 18-85, but also much more expensive, so it&#8217;s a matter of opinion whether that or this was crazier!</p>
<p>But both are awesome <img src='http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17197</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17197</guid>
		<description>Geesh that lens needs it&#039;s own tripod/monopod mount. I envy you for holding it so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geesh that lens needs it&#8217;s own tripod/monopod mount. I envy you for holding it so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17192</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17192</guid>
		<description>I sort of put the test away when I compared the 75-300 and 100-300 to a Canon 100-400 on a 5D3. Probably not a fair technical test, but I thought it practical. The bottom line was at 400mm (the longest effective distance I can test in the lab, equivalent is a 200mm setting on the m4/3 lenses), the Canon was clearly better, which surprised me a bit. So I took them home and shot on a tripod. The Canon on a 5DIII at 400mm and uprezzed 50% still resolved more detail easily than either of the m4/3 lenses at 300 (600 equivalent). 

I know it&#039;s not the camera, because a Leica 135mm on the OM-D totally outclassed the excellent Canon 300 f/4 IS on the 5D III. But all of this confusion got me reevaluating my testing at long distances, whether it was accurate and meaningful, and I set it aside to do some larger sample sizes and decide if I could develop a better method. Then, as so often happens to me, I got off on a contrast - phase detection comparison, then a mirrorless editorial piece, and I&#039;ve got a big study on third-party lenses and peripheral illumination on Canon cameras to write up this week. So I haven&#039;t gotten back to the telephoto thing yet. 

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of put the test away when I compared the 75-300 and 100-300 to a Canon 100-400 on a 5D3. Probably not a fair technical test, but I thought it practical. The bottom line was at 400mm (the longest effective distance I can test in the lab, equivalent is a 200mm setting on the m4/3 lenses), the Canon was clearly better, which surprised me a bit. So I took them home and shot on a tripod. The Canon on a 5DIII at 400mm and uprezzed 50% still resolved more detail easily than either of the m4/3 lenses at 300 (600 equivalent). </p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s not the camera, because a Leica 135mm on the OM-D totally outclassed the excellent Canon 300 f/4 IS on the 5D III. But all of this confusion got me reevaluating my testing at long distances, whether it was accurate and meaningful, and I set it aside to do some larger sample sizes and decide if I could develop a better method. Then, as so often happens to me, I got off on a contrast &#8211; phase detection comparison, then a mirrorless editorial piece, and I&#8217;ve got a big study on third-party lenses and peripheral illumination on Canon cameras to write up this week. So I haven&#8217;t gotten back to the telephoto thing yet. </p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nandadevieast</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17185</link>
		<dc:creator>nandadevieast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17185</guid>
		<description>Ok, thanks. Roger, have you compared these zooms to 70-300 SLR zooms, i mean the better ones? Will the results be much worse than those? For instance, Nikon 70-300 VR vs. Panny 100-300...just to get a general idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thanks. Roger, have you compared these zooms to 70-300 SLR zooms, i mean the better ones? Will the results be much worse than those? For instance, Nikon 70-300 VR vs. Panny 100-300&#8230;just to get a general idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17182</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17182</guid>
		<description>I did test the mirrorless telephotos. I was so disappointed in the results that I decided to make sure I tested several copies of every lens, and with our stock being so low in summer I&#039;ve taken far too long to do it. I apologize. But all I can say right now is longer than the Olympus 75mm I&#039;m tending to shoot non-native on an adapter. 

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did test the mirrorless telephotos. I was so disappointed in the results that I decided to make sure I tested several copies of every lens, and with our stock being so low in summer I&#8217;ve taken far too long to do it. I apologize. But all I can say right now is longer than the Olympus 75mm I&#8217;m tending to shoot non-native on an adapter. </p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nandadevieast</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17174</link>
		<dc:creator>nandadevieast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17174</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger, 
Have been eagerly awaiting your promised write-up on mirror less tele photo zooms :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger,<br />
Have been eagerly awaiting your promised write-up on mirror less tele photo zooms <img src='http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Church</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/my-search-for-the-perfect-micro-43-zoom/comment-page-1#comment-17060</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=8782#comment-17060</guid>
		<description>Roger, as always, you are Da Man.  Slap a monopod onto that baby and take it to your local zoo...if there&#039;s one place where there are always attempts at sly sideways glances between photographers doing the &quot;mine&#039;s bigger than yours&quot; thing it&#039;s there and this would be hysterical!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger, as always, you are Da Man.  Slap a monopod onto that baby and take it to your local zoo&#8230;if there&#8217;s one place where there are always attempts at sly sideways glances between photographers doing the &#8220;mine&#8217;s bigger than yours&#8221; thing it&#8217;s there and this would be hysterical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
