<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autofocus Reality Part 4: Nikon Full Frame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame</link>
	<description>Photo/video thoughts from the largest rental house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Sucsy</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-36364</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Sucsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 19:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-36364</guid>
		<description>Thanks Roger. Great stuff. Very helpful. We&#039;re all deeply indebted for all the time and work you put into this.
Apparently, Canon&#039;s newest generation of PD focus is leading Nikon&#039;s. Interesting. I&#039;m sure Nikon will catch up. I shoot both. No bias. Each has various pros and cons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Roger. Great stuff. Very helpful. We&#8217;re all deeply indebted for all the time and work you put into this.<br />
Apparently, Canon&#8217;s newest generation of PD focus is leading Nikon&#8217;s. Interesting. I&#8217;m sure Nikon will catch up. I shoot both. No bias. Each has various pros and cons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-26131</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-26131</guid>
		<description>Thanks Roger for your great work and time. Another great article. I would only dream about comparison AF precison with lens like 1.2-2.0 for both Nikon and Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Roger for your great work and time. Another great article. I would only dream about comparison AF precison with lens like 1.2-2.0 for both Nikon and Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malchon kao</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-18670</link>
		<dc:creator>malchon kao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-18670</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the analysis. I learned lots of what I can understand.

Auto Focus is not a Focus. 
The focus of Sensor is on the Vertical Strips.

I used Manuel Focus all the times in last 3 years. 
It makes me more concentrate before the shoot pre set the focus range. The result is happy.  
By the way, I am very happy about D800 as oil painting. D700 as a water coloring 
Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the analysis. I learned lots of what I can understand.</p>
<p>Auto Focus is not a Focus.<br />
The focus of Sensor is on the Vertical Strips.</p>
<p>I used Manuel Focus all the times in last 3 years.<br />
It makes me more concentrate before the shoot pre set the focus range. The result is happy.<br />
By the way, I am very happy about D800 as oil painting. D700 as a water coloring<br />
Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark lowden</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-18573</link>
		<dc:creator>mark lowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-18573</guid>
		<description>Roger,

Thanks for your response. I think you are probably right and just about sums up the usefulness of the magazines. None other than of course putting trivia between adverts.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>Thanks for your response. I think you are probably right and just about sums up the usefulness of the magazines. None other than of course putting trivia between adverts.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-18239</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-18239</guid>
		<description>Roger,
I just wanted to thank you for doing the test that I was waiting my whole DSLR life for. Thanks a lot. You should be given a Nobel Prize for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,<br />
I just wanted to thank you for doing the test that I was waiting my whole DSLR life for. Thanks a lot. You should be given a Nobel Prize for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Cicala</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-17818</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Cicala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-17818</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I don&#039;t know if the mags think this kind of stuff has a wide enough audience. I&#039;m also cynical enough to wonder, if I ran a magazine, if I&#039;d be willing to publish something guaranteed to piss off one of my really large advertisers. I&#039;m in a lucky position: I have no advertisers to please, I don&#039;t have to beg the companies for lenses or cameras to review or preview, etc. 

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if the mags think this kind of stuff has a wide enough audience. I&#8217;m also cynical enough to wonder, if I ran a magazine, if I&#8217;d be willing to publish something guaranteed to piss off one of my really large advertisers. I&#8217;m in a lucky position: I have no advertisers to please, I don&#8217;t have to beg the companies for lenses or cameras to review or preview, etc. </p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark lowden</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-17817</link>
		<dc:creator>mark lowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-17817</guid>
		<description>Really interesting and as you said you haven&#039;t the time as you have a business to run. Why can&#039;t the camera mags who purportedly need content to differentiate themselves from what is freely available on the web do this.
I for one would buy those magazines. I currently rarely bother to buy camera magazines as the content is mainly derivative and subjective. Thanks for a most interesting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting and as you said you haven&#8217;t the time as you have a business to run. Why can&#8217;t the camera mags who purportedly need content to differentiate themselves from what is freely available on the web do this.<br />
I for one would buy those magazines. I currently rarely bother to buy camera magazines as the content is mainly derivative and subjective. Thanks for a most interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obican</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-17807</link>
		<dc:creator>obican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-17807</guid>
		<description>Fun time: Let&#039;s get a split screen viewfinder and put that into a 5dm3. Now mount a 85/1.2L in front, just to keep things challenging and try manually to focus that magnificant piece of glass. I wonder how consistant and accurate the results would be :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun time: Let&#8217;s get a split screen viewfinder and put that into a 5dm3. Now mount a 85/1.2L in front, just to keep things challenging and try manually to focus that magnificant piece of glass. I wonder how consistant and accurate the results would be <img src='http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-17806</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-17806</guid>
		<description>&quot;On the other hand, there’s one thing worth considering about the “more accurate” group of new Canon lenses. All are f/2.8 prime lenses. It will be very interesting to see if the the Canon 24-70 f/2.8 II lens&quot;

No, you forgot about the new 70-300mm, which is not f/2.8! It seems Canon has implement this new approch to every single new lens (I&#039;m pretty sure the new 24-70mm wasn&#039;t left out, and most probably the yet to be officially announced 200-400mm.

What will be intersting is how the new 6d performs (especially since it got a supersensitive -3EV center point). Hope this body is as accurate as the 5d3 and 1dx as it will probably be my first FF. But my hopes are not high as you&#039;ve tested the t4i and is not at the same level as the 5d3 and considering the 6d is a really crippled cameras performance wise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the other hand, there’s one thing worth considering about the “more accurate” group of new Canon lenses. All are f/2.8 prime lenses. It will be very interesting to see if the the Canon 24-70 f/2.8 II lens&#8221;</p>
<p>No, you forgot about the new 70-300mm, which is not f/2.8! It seems Canon has implement this new approch to every single new lens (I&#8217;m pretty sure the new 24-70mm wasn&#8217;t left out, and most probably the yet to be officially announced 200-400mm.</p>
<p>What will be intersting is how the new 6d performs (especially since it got a supersensitive -3EV center point). Hope this body is as accurate as the 5d3 and 1dx as it will probably be my first FF. But my hopes are not high as you&#8217;ve tested the t4i and is not at the same level as the 5d3 and considering the 6d is a really crippled cameras performance wise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Loughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/autofocus-reality-part-4-nikon-full-frame/comment-page-1#comment-17804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Loughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/?p=9167#comment-17804</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to do this testing.  I found all 4 parts very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to do this testing.  I found all 4 parts very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
