First Look of the “Bokeh Master” Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series Lens

A couple of years ago I was super excited about the Nikon 105mm f/1.4E. I was so excited I wrote an ode to it. So when Sigma announced their own version with the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series, I immediately got excited. I’ve been a massive fan of the Art series primes since they first debuted, and now they were making this one? Ooh boy, lemme at it.

Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series Review

For those unacquainted, Sigma has been making a habit of creating optical forward lenses without compromise. When speaking purely from a prime lens standpoint (though some of their Art Series zooms are incredible too (Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art Series and Sigma 24-105mm Art Series individually)), Sigma has done an incredible job creating some lenses that have reached the top of their respected class, while managing to keep the price point below their competitors.

Build Quality

First things first, the lens is massive in size and dwarfs the Nikon version, which isn’t a small lens by comparison. It’s the biggest Sigma Art prime to date, besides the bigger 500mm f/4. And that filter size? 105mm. Perhaps just a good luck number for this lens, but I can’t help but think it’s a coincidence.

Sigma 105mm Comparisons

Size comparison from Left to Right – Sigma 135mm f/1.8, Sigma 105mm f/1.4, Sigma 85mm f/1.4, Nikon 105mm f/1.4

But the size difference doesn’t stop at just the size; the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series is also heavy compared to the competition. At 3.62lbs, the Sigma will give your arms a workout. And continuing the comparison to the Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED, which is 2.17lbs (and a filter size of 82mm), the weight difference is very noticeable. In regards to build quality, the added weight only helps contribute to the premium feel of this lens. With its high-quality Art Series design, the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series looks nice and feels like it would comfortably hold up in a professional setting.

Sigma 105mm Review Art Series

Rubber Gasket placement of the Sigma 105mm Art Series

Complete weather sealing is generally something we don’t like to talk about on this blog because we’ve discovered time and time again, that it really doesn’t exist. Rubber gaskets help, and indeed some lenses are better than others, but we’ve yet to see a lens that can hold up in the most extreme conditions. That said, Sigma has added a rubber gasket onto the lens mount, deeming it splash and dust resistant, but I wouldn’t advise taking this lens out to sand dunes on a windy day.


As previously stated, this lens is massive in size, and Sigma was fully aware of this becoming an issue for some and implemented a Tripod mount to the lens itself. Using a built-in Arca Swiss dovetail, the tripod ring not only gives you a quick mounting option for the lens but it also generally makes the lens easier to handhold as well. The tripod ring itself works well as a balancing point, allowing me to hold on to the lens better and help steady the large optics. While it may be a feature depending on the size of your hands, for me, it made hand holding the lens a whole lot easier.

However, I do worry about the hood that comes with the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series. Sigma has done an incredible job with premium optics and design, but I have to fault them a bit when it comes to their hoods. In short, they kind of start to fall apart after some use. Particularly with the Sigma 120-300mm and Sigma 150-600mm Sports Series, we’ve found that the bumpers will come unscrewed over time and begin to fall apart. That said, Sigma may have fixed this issue, as the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series falls more in line with the Canon Supertele Lenses, with a bumper secured to the lock knob with an E clip, instead of a small screw. Only time will tell.

And the price? $1600, a full $600 cheaper than the Nikon. I’m not sure how Sigma is keeping the price that low with the amount of glass that’s in that thing, but I’m not looking a gift horse in the mouth.

Use and Performance

But how does it perform? We don’t have hard numbers yet, because we don’t have enough copies and haven’t been able to keep them inhouse long enough to throw them on the optical bench, but, just like the Nikon, it looks dang sharp. Here are some images I shot with a couple of our other techs at the park the other day.

To test the lens, I was able to hang out with fellow employees, Lynn and Bryce. while this was just a casual testing and not as elaborate as testing charts, even wide open they look sharp through the Sigma. Just like the Nikon, the depth of field is razor thin, so autofocus micro-adjustment can be critical with this lens. This one works with the Sigma USB dock, which is always a welcome thing with these fast primes.

This lens has been called the ‘Bokeh Master’ by many, and for a good reason. At f/1.4, this lens has a razor-thin depth of field – and I say that almost literally. With a minimum focus distance of 1 meter, wide open and at its shortest focusing distance, this lens has a depth of field of just a single centimeter. Nikon shares the same reality with their own Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED, but those numbers are astounding, especially when comparing them with the numbers from other bokeh-heavy lenses like the Canon 85mm f/1.2L II (Which is .81cm of in focus at its maxed settings).

Other than the size and weight, I couldn’t tell too much of a difference between the image quality of the Sigma vs. the Nikon, which is to say, they’re both fantastic. Sigma has done a stellar job with their Art series primes, and the new Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series just continues that level of excellence.

What I Liked:

  • It’s very sharp.
  • It’s very well built and balanced, and the tripod ring and foot is useful.
  • It’s $600 cheaper than the Nikon.

What Could be Improved:

  • Just like the Nikon, I wish this was stabilized.
  • 105mm filters can get pricey, but you save so much on the lens, maybe that makes up for it.
  • Maybe it’s too big? I don’t think so, but I can see how others might.

Sigma has done it again and created another groundbreaking lens while beating out the competition in price. If you were thinking about buying the Nikon 105mm f/1.4E, skip it and buy this instead. The savings in cost more than makes up for the larger size and weight. If you’re shooting Canon or Sony, then it’s without question that this lens should be sitting on your wishlist. The Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art Series is available for Canon, Nikon, and Sony mounts.


Author: Joey Miller

I’m Joey. I love cameras, especially old film cameras, and I can’t remember the last day I didn’t take a photo. Digital cameras are great, and they keep me employed, but I also still like processing my own film. I’m stuck somewhere in the middle. I shoot every single day, no matter what.

Posted in Equipment
  • Mark Harris

    lol Nikon please…give me your inferior and more expensive lens instead of the cheaper and far superior Sigma. Well that makes a lot of sense..

  • Carlz Photography

    I used the Nikon 105mm since the day it was launched and now after switching to Sony I have the Sigma 105mm. Sigma and Sony focus is mutch more reliable than Nikon combos! Sharpness -> both are very sharp and yes on a sony R body the Sigma is Sharper than the Nikon 36mp nikon i used it on. The sigma is optically perfect and its almost impossible to find anything to complain about!
    Yes its a large lens and so is the nikon! the sigma is the bigger of the two but thanks to the collar it’s balanced on i tripod! It’s easier to feel at home with the size of the Sigma if you have owned telefoto lenses like 300mm f2,8 or 200mm f2,8 earlier! q

  • steven choi

    i agree. it is like prop frames

  • steven choi

    it looks much less shaper than nikon. the boker is really strange also.

  • Michael Stone

    For me the Nikon is much more maneuverable, worth the added cost, but, I want eye autofocus along with in body stabilization (Nikon Z series gets me the latter but not the former.). So Sony A7iii is my bokeh rig for the moment.

  • Ed

    I know photographers, and I don’t know ONE that would put out crap and sign their name under it for millions to see, let alone use that excuse…..saving your talent for when you…REALLY need it? HAHAHA

  • Mako

    They serve the purpose of a quick test …

  • Ed

    No thanks…..Nikon please.

Follow on Feedly