First Look: Zeiss CP.2 135mm T2.1
Of course, being a photo guy who loves shooting at 135mm, I can’t wait to get my hands on the photo version of the new Zeiss 135mm lens. I don’t have that yet, but we did get the CP.2 Cine version of the lens, the Zeiss CP.2 135mm T2.1 in today. In addition to making our video shooters all drool, the CP.2 gave us a nice preview of the coming photo lenses.
It looks nice and hefty sitting next to a Canon 135mm f/2.
It looks much better mounted to a Canon 5D Mk III in my hands, don’t you think?
Imatest Results
We tested on the Canon 5D Mk II so we could directly compare it to one of my favorite lenses, the Canon 135mm f/2.0. The Canon is one of the sharpest lenses at f/2.0 we’ve tested. Below are the Imatest MTF50 results at the center, averaged at 13 points over the front surface of the lens, and the average of the 4 corners.
| Center MTF50 | Avg. MTF50 | Avg. Corner MTF50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeiss 135mm T2.1 | 925 | 865 | 770 |
| Canon 135mm f/2.0 | 800 | 710 | 640 |
Long live the new King! The new Zeiss 135mm T2.1 CP.2 (and the hopefully soon to be available ZE and ZF f/2.0) have some pretty amazing numbers. Particularly in the corners. We’ve never had anything do better at this aperture.
I don’t have any nice pictures for you, but there are several people who have gotten copies already and have posted some impressive images. Here are a few links but there are lots more:
http://zeissimages.com/showreplies.php?qid=950
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51185931
http://zeissimages.com/standardgallery.php?lenstype=557&showall
Pretty impressive stuff. It’s priced at $2,200. That’s going to make for a tough decision for Canon shooters with the excellent Canon 135mm f/2.0 lens available at less than half that price. I don’t think anyone will ever complain about the Zeiss image quality, though. It’s spectacular.
Roger Cicala
Lensrentals.com
April, 2013
12 Comments
Tobi ·
Screw the Zeiss. I want that radian-T-Shirt! That is so cool. Where did you get it?
Tobi
Roger Cicala ·
Tobi, I was one of the early Kickstart supporters for them. Got a T-shirt that works great, and a Radian that needs work 🙂
Tippler ·
Why not compare the Zeiss CP.2 135mm T2.1 to the Canon equivalent,the CP.2 135mm/T2.1 EF? Isn’t the Zeiss prices at $5,700 (!) while the Canon cine costs $4,950? The plain old EF 135mm f/1.2L is in a different league.
nepo ·
I have tested APO Sonnar 135mm f2 and the result was amazing.
http://lcap.tistory.com/entry/APO-Sonnar-135mm-f2-Review
David ·
I’d be interested to see a back-to-back comparison with the Canon. The first reviewer goes on about color and contrast relative to lesser lenses. Is the difference as stark as he describes? If you posted the raw files for us to play with, that would be very helpful. My take has been that post-processing tricks can obscure the differences in similar lenses, but it’s rare to have files from the same scene.
nepo ·
Comparison data was cropped from JPG images converted from RAW files.
White balance was daylight.Thus,the condition was same.
Cate ·
Is it usable for handheld photography? The focus ring seems very tiny.
Daniel ·
Roger, I see that you are (were) backer of the Radian on kickstarter (if the t-shirt was not a gift by some unsatisfied backer …). I have backed Genie and Astro (it was a tough choice between Astro and Radian, but I decided that the chance to set all important factors manualy is good addition over Radian). Any chance to read something about the Radian from you? I believe they already shipped it. Thanks in advance.
Lee Saxon ·
Cate, that’s specific to this cine rehousing (focus ring is designed for follow focus gears, not your hand). The stills (ZF.2/ZE) version has a regular focus ring just like all the other ZF.2/ZE’s.
Archbrook ·
Hello Roger, will you test new Nikon 18-35 AF-S? sorry for irrelevant post.
noble_elm ·
That looks huge. Is the part after the focus distances (huge black part where the lens name is located) just the built in lens hood or are there glass inside it?
Roger Cicala ·
No built-in hood, although the glass is recessed a bit.