Equipment

Teardown of the Canon EOS R Mirrorless Camera

I’ve wanted to look inside the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless cameras since the moment they were announced, so I’m probably more excited about this than you guys are. I’m really not sure what to expect. Early on, when we took apart a Sony A7R, we were struck by how clean and straightforward mirrorless cameras were compared to DSLRs. Later, we took apart an A7RIII and found that increased capabilities led to increased complexity, although still not as complex inside as a DSLR.

So we expected things not to be too complicated – no mirror box, optical prisms, off-sensor AF system, etc. We hope Canon cameras to have clean, even elegant, engineering; like the 5D IV teardown shows. We haven’t done a Nikon SLR teardown in quite a while (the D7000 was the last one), but their camera engineering is pretty similar to Canon’s, although being Nikon they still like to leave some soldered-wire connections here and there. So we figured that the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless full-frame cameras would be more straightforward than their SLR cameras, and perhaps Nikon set down the soldering gun and slowly stepped away.

But really we had no idea how things would look inside, if we might see some cool new engineering, what the weather resistance would be like, etc. So we took apart both a  Canon EOS-R and a Nikon Z7 just to have a look around. (The Z will get written up as soon as I can get to it.)

The EOS-R

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The Outside

Since this is a brand new camera to us, we started by removing all the grip rubber so we could see where most of the screws were. It’s worth noting that Canon seems to have new grip adhesive tape; it was both easier to remove and retained its stickiness for replacement better than what we’ve seen before. Important news for the none of you that intend to repair your cameras at home, but we like it.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Now the camera looks kind of like your dog shaved down for summer. I kind of like it, though. If I get one, I may just take the grips off. The shell, BTW, seems to be a polycarbonate with a slightly rough surface. It would grip nicely.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The rubber around the viewfinder is actually screwed into place. Good news for those of you who, like me, sometimes find yourself wondering when the viewfinder rubber came off. Bad news for those of you who like to take it off on purpose for some reason or other.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Next, we went to the side to remove the I/O port covers. This is held on by four screws; removing those lets it slide right off.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the cover off we see a very nice flex along the I/O ports. Why ‘nice’ you ask? Because that means that some or all of the I/O ports are not soldered to the main PCB. We have to replace a lot of main PCBs because someone jerked a cable, pulling an I/O port off of the board.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Next, we remove all the visible screws around the body.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

And the diopter adjustment from the viewfinder.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

There is a nice thick weather seal under the diopter adjustment knob. For those who want to skip ahead, the knobs and dials are all weather sealed nicely, but not much else. As long as it only rains on your knobs and dials, though, you should be fine.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Opening the Case

With all the screws out, the back assembly can be removed, LCD and all, after the flexes between it and the main PCB are detached.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

At a glance, this looks much like a Canon SLR: the back assembly containing the LCD and controls, the main PCB with neatly laid out flexes.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Looking closer, there are some apparent differences. First among these is that the shutter motor and electronics are at the bottom of the camera, underneath the shutter box. In a Canon DSLR, it’s generally to one side.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Here’s a close up of the shutter motor for those into such things.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

I should also show there’s weather sealing below each of the top dials. As you can see to the right of that, though, the rest of the body depends on a plastic overlap to keep stuff out, there are no gaskets.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The Back and LCD Assembly

The back panel looks like the rear panel from any camera with a hinged LCD. There’s shielding over the controls (left in the picture below) and connections are going out to the LCD.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

One thing that caught our attention immediately was the LCD attachment. You can see it seems only held down by two screws and a metal clamp. This could be great (LCD change is a common repair) unless it’s weak (making LCD replacement a more common repair).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The bracket looks pretty robust, though, and the screws holding it down are the largest in the camera by far.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The bottom line is it makes LCD replacement something takes minutes, not hours.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

And the bracing and weather sealing around the bracket are excellent and sturdy.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

While we were back here, we removed the shielding to look at the weather sealing around the buttons. Again, thick and excellent.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Other Subassemblies

We’d already unfastened all the screws and disconnected flexes, so we slid out the I/O subassembly.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

I was a little disappointed, but not surprised, that it contained only the RCA-type plugs. Better than nothing, of course, but the HDMI plug is the one that rips off the board most frequently, at least in our experience.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Similarly, the EVF had already been disconnected so it could slide right out.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Finally, the top assembly was removed (there were two more screws internally holding this on).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The top assembly has a lot of electronics and connections: EVF, various selectors and switches, the top LCD, and the touch bar. From a repair standpoint the top assembly is a single part; if anything in there breaks, you replace the whole thing. It can be disassembled but it’s very time consuming, and there’s no reason to. I will note, because the photo is small, that there is no weather-sealing foam along the edges. Plastic-to-plastic contact is all the weather sealing there is.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Main Body

With all the subassemblies removed, Aaron just had to remove the half dozen screws to take off the main PCB.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

You can see a small electrical shield on the surface of the board in the image above; there’s more significant shielding underneath.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the shields removed we can see the PCB is not particularly dense.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The inner side shows the SD card slot soldered to the board. Repair guys hate this since a broken card slot means replacing the entire board, but SD card slots are certainly more reliable than CF slots. Soldering the SD assembly to the board is the way it’s usually done.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the PCB removed, all that’s left to see is the image sensor’s board (green), the shutter mechanism below it, and the battery box (black). Like all mirrorless cameras, the EOS-R is simpler than an SLR.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

If you look carefully at the aluminum frame over the image sensor, you’ll notice 3 Torx (star) screw heads, two along the left side, one in the upper right. These are the sensor adjustment screws. During assembly, the image sensor is adjusted so that it is perfectly (in theory) aligned with the lens mount.

Each of these screws is spring-loaded. They are loosened and tightened during the adjustment process to align the sensor and lens mount to be within a few microns of parallel. We don’t have the automated equipment to do this adjustment (we can do it, but it involves hours of trial and error) so we aren’t going to do any further disassembly of the sensor plate.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The last piece to take off is the bottom plate.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

While there was no weather sealing around the edges of the plate, but there is some at the tripod mount.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The tripod mounting plate comes off next, and there’s an important detail here. The tripod screw inserts into a pressed out cup (red arrow).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

We like long cups because a long tripod plate screw (and they vary in length) can pop the top of a short cup out, leaving a free-floating piece of metal inside your camera. Free-floating metal inside your camera is a bad thing. A very bad thing. This one is nice and long and I can’t imagine a problem occurring.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Here is the socket in the camera that the tripod cup sits in. The aluminum plate that you see crossing the hole is the sensor frame. You can see this would be a bad place to have a piece of metal floating around in. Not to mention a bad place to have a hole open to the environment.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Before we start putting things back together, we’ll show you a front view of the stripped down camera. I’ll mention that I like that auto-close shutter feature a lot.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Summary

It was rather a boring disassembly, really, about what we should expect for Canon doing a Canon 6D Mark II quality mirrorless camera. It’s neatly laid out and nicely engineered inside. One thing that struck me is that it’s not very crowded inside there, or as we like to say ‘they left a lot of air inside’.

This view that I haven’t shown you yet, kind of illustrates that; there’s a pretty big gap between the circuit boards and the image sensor. If you look back at the Sony A7R III teardown (or the Nikon Z teardown to come) you’ll notice there’s not that much space inside; it’s taken up by the IBIS system which is big and thick.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Do I think future Rs are going to have IBIS? No, I don’t. Canon has been very clear that they think lens stabilization is superior. The space is probably just a matter of ergonomics and perhaps heat diffusion. But there’s certainly room for it.

Speaking of the Sony A7RIII, it’s taken a bit of internet trashing for its lack of weather sealing. Throw no stones from your glass house, oh Canon shooters. The Canon EOS-R is just about the same; well-sealed buttons and dials, not much else. That means, I think, that it will be fine in a misty rain for a while, but don’t get it saturated and don’t set it somewhere wet.

You can make an argument that tightly fitted plastic shells are good weather sealing. Then again, you can argue that weather sealing means waterproof. Lots of people do that on the way to finding out the warranty doesn’t cover water damage.

The Canon EOS-R sells currently for $2299. It’s very close in build quality and weather sealing to the Canon 6D II which sells for about $1600. So for $600 you get the R mount, cool new slider bar thingie, a bit better (we assume) processing and four more megapixels. That actually sounds fairly reasonable to me.

Reason also suggests Canon is working the kinks out with a (fairly) reasonably priced camera before they come out with a mirrorless pro-level camera. But being reasonable never got anybody anywhere on the internet. The internet is filled with people pretending they’re moving from one brand to another as they justify the choices they’ve already made. So I will, in internet fashion, do some click-bait brand comparison.

The Sony A7r III can be had for a bit under $3,000, has equal build quality, a better native lens selection, more megapixels, etc. My opinion is it’s a better camera (not necessarily system) for the money. It should be; we’re comparing the first generation to a fourth generation.

The Nikon Z6 (comparable to the Canon EOS-R) is $2150 while the Nikon Z7 (comparable to the Sony A7RIII, at least in megapixels) runs a touch over $3,500. I’ll make more build quality comparison’s when I’ve taken a Z apart.

So, which would I buy, right now? None of the above; I don’t know enough yet, and I try very hard to avoid Generation 1 technology. If you forced me into a corner and said: “if you made your living with a camera, what would you shoot today?” I’d say either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR.

That’s today, and that’s my logical answer. Tomorrow (tomorrow being a couple of years) I will absolutely be shooting a mirrorless camera, but I have no idea yet which one. Of course, those of you who know me very well know I won’t be able to stand it, and I’ll ignore my own advice and get one of these in a month or two; and almost certainly decide it was the wrong one a month or two after that.

 

 

Roger Cicala and Aaron Closz

Lensrentals.com

October, 2018

Author: Roger Cicala

I’m Roger and I am the founder of Lensrentals.com. Hailed as one of the optic nerds here, I enjoy shooting collimated light through 30X microscope objectives in my spare time. When I do take real pictures I like using something different: a Medium format, or Pentax K1, or a Sony RX1R.

Posted in Equipment
  • mtnman1984

    My a7rii survived a 50mph car accident where it had an adapted 50mm Sigma attached with the Metabones adapter. It flew off the seat and smacked the sill trim near the front of the door destroying the screen and denting the filter ring on the lens. Both were completely functional. That lens is not light and the back of the body took the initial impact. I did have the lens completely rebuilt and aligned while the dress ring was replaced and I’m not a cheerleader of Sony durability, but I was completely impressed that the whole kit was usable. Cameras are more sturdy than we realize.

  • It depends on the type, place and severity of the impact. Once I accidentally dropped Fuji X-T1 on a concrete ground (with XF 23 F1.4), and it just got few dents and slight deformations of metal corners and brass lens filter. Camera worked perfectly after that hit. Looks like Canon R would also survive in similar case. Each camera has own weak spots and it’s definitely great when composite plastic/metal body is able to absorb extra stress without serious failures.

  • dkphotoman723

    I agree – more dust with mirrorless in my experience. And not only dust. Once had a drop of water (from a tree still wet after rain) drip onto the sensor of my mirrorless when changing lenses. Very glad to see Canon has come up with this feature.

  • dkphotoman723

    Seriously? The majority of camera buyers will use the kit lens – which is a zoom with IS. Or other zoom lenses bought within the last 5-10 years – the majority of which have IS. Most primes are wide angle where you rarely need any IS since they can be hand held at considerably slower exposure times. Sure IBIS would be nice – and certainly for that small percentage of folks with older lenses, mayne even a necessity, but for most users will have IS lenses. One should also mention that a number of reviewers mention that IBIS on a FF camera is not nearly as effective as IBIS on cropped cameras – such as the Olympus M4/3rds cameras, or as effective as lens IS for FF cameras.

  • It has to be mechanical – the camera can’t be powered on during the adjustment: it’s basically disassembled except for the frame, sensor, and mount.

  • hugh crawford

    If you can adjust the sensor position with the camera powered on:

    Another idea is to have two lenses projecting an identical pattern of dots on the sensor, so that they superimpose when the sensor is in the correct position. At any other position they would not be aligned. To make it extra easy you could have a mode for course adjustment where the two patterns were in different colors.This is probably the easiest one to implement.

    A high quality high speed short focal length lens with an aperture stop that blocked the center of the aperture rather than the periphery would make the out of focus points rings rather than points. Ordinary photographic lenses might not be up to it but “laser grade” lenses that are corrected for one wavelength with a matching LED would do the trick. This is actually sort of the same idea as the DVD laser servo thing where the spot changes shape depending on distance

  • Mugatu

    Kinda disapointing news but we’ll have to see how it holds up IRL.

    Also can’t say i agree with the 6D comparison that “for $600 you get the R mount, cool new slider bar thingie, a bit better (we assume) processing and four more megapixels”. EOS R also includes a Digic 8, 5D4 sensor, EVF, 4K, Canon Log, 10-bit 4:2:2 out.. all that in a lighter more compact package.

  • Em Bee

    The canon body is metal, with a plastic shell.

  • Sony telephotos are priced wildly, in comparison to performance, vs at least Canon lenses.

  • The Canon 5DS is very, very quiet, even in burst mode. Search on “The Sounds of the Canon EOS 5Ds” for a side by side comparison with a bunch of recent DSLRs. I don’t like shutter noise, but I could live with that, especially as single photos and not bursts. Anybody shooting live performance should get a lifetime ban for using burst mode during a performance (unless of course there’s a crescendo of noise on stage).

  • Bruce Campbell

    Love these teardown articles, it’s like Modern Photography did in the old days, and I’ve really missed them.

  • Thank you Hugh! Those seem like pretty straightforward methods that have promise!

  • Em Bee

    Is there any conformal coat on the circuit cards? That might alleviate the percieved weakness in moisture resistance provided by tight-fit panels.

  • Em Bee

    Yes, IBIS too. Case in point: Pentax K-1.

    Additionally if you wanted to, you could put an EVF into an SLR for use in lockup mode.

  • Yeah YOU don’t use any lenses that would benefit from IBIS, but you do not represent the majority. By far the majority of users would like to have IBIS, as most prime lenses don’t have IS.

    The same thing about exposure preview in the viewfinder. You don’t use it, but a lot of people do. And if you don’t need it you can turn it off.

    Interesting how you begin by saying that mirrorless makes more sense for video as if it was a general truth, and when called out for being wrong, say that it only applies to your limited usage. You should have made that clear to begin with. Those things ARE revolutionary for those who need it, I’m one of them and I know it’s the case for many more.

  • IBIS too? You must be joking. That is a very poor excuse. The entire point is that you get all of those things in the big clear viewfinder.

  • Kirk Durston

    Hmmmm. I’ve only had mine for just over a week. I’ll have to mull this over in my mind for a day or two before deciding whether or not to hose it down.;)

  • hugh crawford

    Oh of the top of my head…

    You could do like the old autofocus slide projectors . Use a light beam reflected off the sensor at the greatest angle you can manage through the lens mount that you calibrating to to find the depth roughly, and a beam on axis to get the sensor aligned much like aligning an enlarger, but if you had the target 20 feet aray it would be pretty accurate.

    Of course if you happened to have an autocollimator lyin around it would save you the trouble of making your own janky substitute.

    Anyway that would get you pretty close, then to get the sensor positioned within a wavelength there are all sorts of laser interferometer designs that hobbyists have made. If you set up the test fixture against a known good camera, the fact that it is relatively uncalibrated wouldn’t be a problem. A Michelson interferometer design wouldn’t be too hard but a Bath interferometer would be dead easy.
    https://www.instructables.com/id/Desktop-Michelson-Morely-Interferometer/

    a Bath
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KQAjmUC7KE

    I have also heard of folks using the servo mechanism for focusing the laser in DVD players ans a distance measuring tool. you get a millimeter or two of standoff distance and a micron of accuracy.

    That’s probably the cheapest and easiest test fixture. Take four DVD player laser assemblies, attach them to a lens mount, get them a millimeter away from the sensor and lock them down. Read the servo feedback voltages off of a known good sensor. Attach the test fixture to the camera you want to adjust and tweak the screws until the voltages match.

    http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/laserlia.htm#liarfi4 gives some details.

    If you could adjust the sensor while it was operating you could do all sorts of other things. Holographic interferometry would be interesting if you wanted to make a cheap commercial product since you can literally contact print the optics and they are sensitive enough to measure the index of refraction of the air.

  • pest

    That Batis 135/2.8 let me smile every time i review the taken photos. What a lens!

  • pest

    Sure you are better then eyeAF lol. Paid models willing to wait for you šŸ˜‰

  • Turk Turkleton

    I’m a Nikon guy but I’d still pick Canon over Fuji any day. The metal body won’t do you any good when the shock from the drop messes up your shutter and other components.

  • Turk Turkleton

    I’m a Nikon guy but I’d still pick Canon over Fuji any day. The metal body won’t do you any good when the shock from the drop messes up your shutter and other components.

  • Kirk, send me the camera and I’ll do it. Tyler isn’t donating one for the cause. BTW – I’d suggest food coloring in the water, makes the pictures better.

  • Hugh, 10 micron accuracy and you can’t touch the sensor with anything. GO!!! šŸ™‚

  • hugh crawford

    “Each of these screws is spring-loaded. They are loosened and tightened during the adjustment process to align the sensor and lens mount to be within a few microns of parallel. We donā€™t have the automated equipment to do this adjustment (we can do it, but it involves hours of trial and error) so we arenā€™t going to do any further disassembly of the sensor plate.”

    Roger I can think of at least two* simple fixtures to make that alignment really simple and fast, but I am sure you can too. I mean aligning a shiny reflective flat piece of glass, how hard could it be?

    *Now I’m up to six

  • Daniel Taylor

    Tony Northrup had a graph comparing in-focus A7 III (75%) and EOS R (50%) Eye-AF shots, and I regularly do better than either on my own. Focus calibration is done once, on some lenses. WB is set when converting your RAWs. (Or in controlled lighting prior to the shoot with a white card and custom WB.) And nearly every lens I own has IS. (The few that don’t are ‘speciality’ lenses shot from a tripod.)

    Focus magnification for manual lenses is a mirrorless win and if I wanted to adapt a large number of old FF lenses I would have an R or a Sony.

    I used to think exposure preview was a big leap, but my most recent Canon body (5Ds) has such a reliable meter that I’ve gone back to just trusting it and being fine. With my previous body I spent a great deal of time in M. Now I’m in Av, Tv, or M with auto ISO set.

    So while those things are sorta nice, they are not the revolutions mirrorless fans portray them to be. OVF, battery life, no lens adapters…that’s enough to keep a lot of people in the DSLR camp for a while.

  • Kirk Durston

    Given the odd weather sealing on the R (great on the knobs and dials, but plastic-plastic everywhere else), I would have liked to see the tear-down performed after letting the camera sit in the shower for about 10 minutes. That would tell the story re. plastic-plastic water leakage.

  • Em Bee

    An SLR can support all those things in live view.

  • “If still images are more important, SLR holds its ground and will continue to do so in my opinion.”

    Sounds like you’re forgetting things like Eye-AF, the no need for focus calibration, seeing exposure&white balance in the finder before the image is taken, focus magnification for manual lenses, and that IBIS also helps for still images.

    I have no idea how you come to the conclusion that mirrorless makes more sense for video than stills.

  • Ada

    Iā€™ve EOS Ms, Fuji Xs, and a Canon FF DSLR. My none scientific experience is: I had way more issues with dust and dirt on my ML systems over 2 years than over 10+ years DSLR. Iā€™m now traveling with a ā€œsensor penā€ because of this

Follow on Feedly