Equipment

Teardown of the Canon EOS R Mirrorless Camera

I’ve wanted to look inside the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless cameras since the moment they were announced, so I’m probably more excited about this than you guys are. I’m really not sure what to expect. Early on, when we took apart a Sony A7R, we were struck by how clean and straightforward mirrorless cameras were compared to DSLRs. Later, we took apart an A7RIII and found that increased capabilities led to increased complexity, although still not as complex inside as a DSLR.

So we expected things not to be too complicated – no mirror box, optical prisms, off-sensor AF system, etc. We hope Canon cameras to have clean, even elegant, engineering; like the 5D IV teardown shows. We haven’t done a Nikon SLR teardown in quite a while (the D7000 was the last one), but their camera engineering is pretty similar to Canon’s, although being Nikon they still like to leave some soldered-wire connections here and there. So we figured that the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless full-frame cameras would be more straightforward than their SLR cameras, and perhaps Nikon set down the soldering gun and slowly stepped away.

But really we had no idea how things would look inside, if we might see some cool new engineering, what the weather resistance would be like, etc. So we took apart both a  Canon EOS-R and a Nikon Z7 just to have a look around. (The Z will get written up as soon as I can get to it.)

The EOS-R

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The Outside

Since this is a brand new camera to us, we started by removing all the grip rubber so we could see where most of the screws were. It’s worth noting that Canon seems to have new grip adhesive tape; it was both easier to remove and retained its stickiness for replacement better than what we’ve seen before. Important news for the none of you that intend to repair your cameras at home, but we like it.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Now the camera looks kind of like your dog shaved down for summer. I kind of like it, though. If I get one, I may just take the grips off. The shell, BTW, seems to be a polycarbonate with a slightly rough surface. It would grip nicely.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The rubber around the viewfinder is actually screwed into place. Good news for those of you who, like me, sometimes find yourself wondering when the viewfinder rubber came off. Bad news for those of you who like to take it off on purpose for some reason or other.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Next, we went to the side to remove the I/O port covers. This is held on by four screws; removing those lets it slide right off.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the cover off we see a very nice flex along the I/O ports. Why ‘nice’ you ask? Because that means that some or all of the I/O ports are not soldered to the main PCB. We have to replace a lot of main PCBs because someone jerked a cable, pulling an I/O port off of the board.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Next, we remove all the visible screws around the body.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

And the diopter adjustment from the viewfinder.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

There is a nice thick weather seal under the diopter adjustment knob. For those who want to skip ahead, the knobs and dials are all weather sealed nicely, but not much else. As long as it only rains on your knobs and dials, though, you should be fine.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Opening the Case

With all the screws out, the back assembly can be removed, LCD and all, after the flexes between it and the main PCB are detached.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

At a glance, this looks much like a Canon SLR: the back assembly containing the LCD and controls, the main PCB with neatly laid out flexes.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Looking closer, there are some apparent differences. First among these is that the shutter motor and electronics are at the bottom of the camera, underneath the shutter box. In a Canon DSLR, it’s generally to one side.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Here’s a close up of the shutter motor for those into such things.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

I should also show there’s weather sealing below each of the top dials. As you can see to the right of that, though, the rest of the body depends on a plastic overlap to keep stuff out, there are no gaskets.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The Back and LCD Assembly

The back panel looks like the rear panel from any camera with a hinged LCD. There’s shielding over the controls (left in the picture below) and connections are going out to the LCD.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

One thing that caught our attention immediately was the LCD attachment. You can see it seems only held down by two screws and a metal clamp. This could be great (LCD change is a common repair) unless it’s weak (making LCD replacement a more common repair).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The bracket looks pretty robust, though, and the screws holding it down are the largest in the camera by far.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The bottom line is it makes LCD replacement something takes minutes, not hours.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

And the bracing and weather sealing around the bracket are excellent and sturdy.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

While we were back here, we removed the shielding to look at the weather sealing around the buttons. Again, thick and excellent.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Other Subassemblies

We’d already unfastened all the screws and disconnected flexes, so we slid out the I/O subassembly.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

I was a little disappointed, but not surprised, that it contained only the RCA-type plugs. Better than nothing, of course, but the HDMI plug is the one that rips off the board most frequently, at least in our experience.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Similarly, the EVF had already been disconnected so it could slide right out.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Finally, the top assembly was removed (there were two more screws internally holding this on).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The top assembly has a lot of electronics and connections: EVF, various selectors and switches, the top LCD, and the touch bar. From a repair standpoint the top assembly is a single part; if anything in there breaks, you replace the whole thing. It can be disassembled but it’s very time consuming, and there’s no reason to. I will note, because the photo is small, that there is no weather-sealing foam along the edges. Plastic-to-plastic contact is all the weather sealing there is.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Main Body

With all the subassemblies removed, Aaron just had to remove the half dozen screws to take off the main PCB.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

You can see a small electrical shield on the surface of the board in the image above; there’s more significant shielding underneath.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the shields removed we can see the PCB is not particularly dense.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The inner side shows the SD card slot soldered to the board. Repair guys hate this since a broken card slot means replacing the entire board, but SD card slots are certainly more reliable than CF slots. Soldering the SD assembly to the board is the way it’s usually done.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the PCB removed, all that’s left to see is the image sensor’s board (green), the shutter mechanism below it, and the battery box (black). Like all mirrorless cameras, the EOS-R is simpler than an SLR.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

If you look carefully at the aluminum frame over the image sensor, you’ll notice 3 Torx (star) screw heads, two along the left side, one in the upper right. These are the sensor adjustment screws. During assembly, the image sensor is adjusted so that it is perfectly (in theory) aligned with the lens mount.

Each of these screws is spring-loaded. They are loosened and tightened during the adjustment process to align the sensor and lens mount to be within a few microns of parallel. We don’t have the automated equipment to do this adjustment (we can do it, but it involves hours of trial and error) so we aren’t going to do any further disassembly of the sensor plate.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The last piece to take off is the bottom plate.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

While there was no weather sealing around the edges of the plate, but there is some at the tripod mount.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The tripod mounting plate comes off next, and there’s an important detail here. The tripod screw inserts into a pressed out cup (red arrow).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

We like long cups because a long tripod plate screw (and they vary in length) can pop the top of a short cup out, leaving a free-floating piece of metal inside your camera. Free-floating metal inside your camera is a bad thing. A very bad thing. This one is nice and long and I can’t imagine a problem occurring.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Here is the socket in the camera that the tripod cup sits in. The aluminum plate that you see crossing the hole is the sensor frame. You can see this would be a bad place to have a piece of metal floating around in. Not to mention a bad place to have a hole open to the environment.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Before we start putting things back together, we’ll show you a front view of the stripped down camera. I’ll mention that I like that auto-close shutter feature a lot.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Summary

It was rather a boring disassembly, really, about what we should expect for Canon doing a Canon 6D Mark II quality mirrorless camera. It’s neatly laid out and nicely engineered inside. One thing that struck me is that it’s not very crowded inside there, or as we like to say ‘they left a lot of air inside’.

This view that I haven’t shown you yet, kind of illustrates that; there’s a pretty big gap between the circuit boards and the image sensor. If you look back at the Sony A7R III teardown (or the Nikon Z teardown to come) you’ll notice there’s not that much space inside; it’s taken up by the IBIS system which is big and thick.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Do I think future Rs are going to have IBIS? No, I don’t. Canon has been very clear that they think lens stabilization is superior. The space is probably just a matter of ergonomics and perhaps heat diffusion. But there’s certainly room for it.

Speaking of the Sony A7RIII, it’s taken a bit of internet trashing for its lack of weather sealing. Throw no stones from your glass house, oh Canon shooters. The Canon EOS-R is just about the same; well-sealed buttons and dials, not much else. That means, I think, that it will be fine in a misty rain for a while, but don’t get it saturated and don’t set it somewhere wet.

You can make an argument that tightly fitted plastic shells are good weather sealing. Then again, you can argue that weather sealing means waterproof. Lots of people do that on the way to finding out the warranty doesn’t cover water damage.

The Canon EOS-R sells currently for $2299. It’s very close in build quality and weather sealing to the Canon 6D II which sells for about $1600. So for $600 you get the R mount, cool new slider bar thingie, a bit better (we assume) processing and four more megapixels. That actually sounds fairly reasonable to me.

Reason also suggests Canon is working the kinks out with a (fairly) reasonably priced camera before they come out with a mirrorless pro-level camera. But being reasonable never got anybody anywhere on the internet. The internet is filled with people pretending they’re moving from one brand to another as they justify the choices they’ve already made. So I will, in internet fashion, do some click-bait brand comparison.

The Sony A7r III can be had for a bit under $3,000, has equal build quality, a better native lens selection, more megapixels, etc. My opinion is it’s a better camera (not necessarily system) for the money. It should be; we’re comparing the first generation to a fourth generation.

The Nikon Z6 (comparable to the Canon EOS-R) is $2150 while the Nikon Z7 (comparable to the Sony A7RIII, at least in megapixels) runs a touch over $3,500. I’ll make more build quality comparison’s when I’ve taken a Z apart.

So, which would I buy, right now? None of the above; I don’t know enough yet, and I try very hard to avoid Generation 1 technology. If you forced me into a corner and said: “if you made your living with a camera, what would you shoot today?” I’d say either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR.

That’s today, and that’s my logical answer. Tomorrow (tomorrow being a couple of years) I will absolutely be shooting a mirrorless camera, but I have no idea yet which one. Of course, those of you who know me very well know I won’t be able to stand it, and I’ll ignore my own advice and get one of these in a month or two; and almost certainly decide it was the wrong one a month or two after that.

 

 

Roger Cicala and Aaron Closz

Lensrentals.com

October, 2018

Author: Roger Cicala

I’m Roger and I am the founder of Lensrentals.com. Hailed as one of the optic nerds here, I enjoy shooting collimated light through 30X microscope objectives in my spare time. When I do take real pictures I like using something different: a Medium format, or Pentax K1, or a Sony RX1R.

Posted in Equipment
  • Ada

    Thank you, we don’t need you to misrepresent and drag out of context what Roger wrote above, we can read it ourselves.
    You could join the trolls at dpreview.com. Over there many people are not skilled enough to go over here, so they might even trust you.

  • I really don’t have a lot of expertise on that. The early Sony IBIS broke a lot and was very free floating, but they seem to have solved that problem.

  • I thought both the R and Z viewfinders, as well as the A7Riii were flicker free. But my eyes aren’t great, so you may see something I can’t see.

  • Chik Sum

    Nice tear down, a bit off topic roger, I personally tried thenA7R ii and a Leica S2 previously and what I found uncomfortable is that it really look less 3D and lively in the EVF compared to the ovf, and I can actually see the screen flickers or refreshes which makes my eye sour much easier than with a DSLR, do you find this a problem?

  • dacian

    Can you give an opinion about the IBIS systems of Sony, Nikon and Canon (lack of)?
    I never understood why Sony’s rattles around so wildly when the camera is turned off. Now I saw that on the Nikon it’s fixed. I didn’t feel any movement at all. I don’t know about Olympus or other smaller sensor cameras.
    Any thoughts on the implementation options the companies went with?

  • Em Bee

    Thanks!

  • We don’t trust ourselves to accurately solder to the board traces; the machine welds are tiny and we don’t have the mad soldering skills doing that kind of work takes. Ditto for HDMI ports.

  • Stefanie Daniella

    EOS R
    Looks superbly engineered
    robust yet light for a wi-fi
    =(polycarbonate body; instead of metal-alloy body)
    mobile-centric
    shoot-n-share
    FF camera body
    (cine + stills)

    much like it’s smaller APSC EOS M50 wifi-friendly sibling

    other FF/APSC mfrs
    none from Sony/Nikon
    offer anything in the shoot-n-share “on the go” mobile friendly category

    their users may be more post-it-after-processing-at-home types

    so, EOS R / EOS M50 is not for everyone

  • Nick Podrebarac

    That makes a lot of sense. There are definitely some areas where the e-mount lineup is overpriced and/or meh. It’ll be interesting if the 24mm F1.4 GM would supplant the adapted alternative. Either way, as a fledgling Sony shooter, I’m feverishly taking notes of which lens areas to possibly wait out a bit.

  • Michael Sandman

    Thoughtful and fun to read, as usual.

  • Thom Hogan

    No it doesn’t. Mine’s powered off. Shutter open. You might want to check your yes, not your hands.

  • Silvestro Crino

    Sure… Sony native lenses will always beat the adapted stuff when it counts…. but it’s still nice to be able to adapt other brands of lenses… especially older stuff with a bit of character… to my Sony bodies.

  • StefenSlagowski
  • Jefferson

    These teardown pieces, I’m finding, are always thorough, clearly and brilliantly written. Thank you for all the effort you put into them. Just this week, after a long run of using Canon, I purchased my first Sony a9 and a few lenses. Then earlier today I held an EOS-R for the first time. I was struck by how solid the build was and the very logical and intuitive, at least for a current Canon user, button and dial placement. I’m very, very conflicted.

  • Em Bee

    “The inner side shows the SD card slot soldered to the board. Repair guys hate this since a broken card slot means replacing the entire board,”

    Roger – why wouldn’t you just reflow the solder and replace the component?

  • That soldered on SD slot makes me sad. Way back in 2013, my SD slot broke a pin. It was mostly a breeze to replace being that it was on it’s own board. Hell, I didn’t even fully disassemble the camera (I couldn’t find all the screws), I just got enough out to remove the slot and swap in the new one.

  • Michael Ogle

    Could it be like Nikon and the 750 body which they claim as carbon but is actually plastic with carbon fibers….Canon may have mag fibers in plastic?

  • If you want some quick examples, I’m a 35mmm f1.4 fan and that’s one where I’d be shooting adapted along with a 24mm f1.4 which I also like. Also all supertelephotos which I use quite a bit. Tilt-shifts, of course. Maybe also a 70-200 zoom, although that would be from a reliability and price standpoint, not image quality. For standard and wide zooms, at 50 and 85mm, for a macro I’d go with native Sony.

  • Paul Bishop Jr.

    I have read many of Roger’s articles. They have provide important information for making a informed purchase. I own two identical canon bodies and use them heavily. I shoot over 100 images EVERY day.. The 7D Mark II bodies have never let me down. But after being in the technical field for over 30 years.. The most important thing to do with ANY brand of equipment is to READ THE MANUAL.. I am willing to bet over 80% of camera owners do not even know where the manual is.. Sad.. Because the majority of features are best applied when you know how to use them. Yes this R body is new territory sort of.. Lots of stuff designed on proven equipment. I will likely replace both bodies with mirror-less when the 2nd generation hits the market..

  • bdbender4

    I have overcome my Canikon FF mirrorless GAS. I got the new 32mm f/1.4 lens for my EOS M5 and am happily playing with that. I like the size and weight of APS-C mirrorless, used Fuji for a while also.

    Meanwhile I am waiting for the Nikon Z6 to actually appear, and for Roger and Aaron to do a teardown on that.

    Personally the control setup on the R doesn’t appeal to me at all, and the R also looks overpriced in comparison to the Z6. The bodies are comparably priced, but if you want either one with the kit lens – i.e. if you want to take advantage of either new mount rather than use adapted “old system” lenses – the Canon is $800 more(!) I think Nikon is being smarter by having a good package price from the get-go, rather than hi-pricing the initial demand the way Canon tends to.

  • Fawn__Liebowitz

    He didn’t say that he’d only use the Sony with a bunch of adapted glass. He said “…either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR”.

    That statement doesn’t rule out the option of using Sony glass too. I think that’s true of many Nikon and Canon shooters: there are lens from those vendors that aren’t available from Sony so switching to Sony right now would require the use of adapters.

  • pl capeli

    great

  • MEAllred

    Refurb – Please – My take is correct especially with regards to EVeners statement saying “he’d avoid the Sony mirrorless systems as well” – so get the sh*t out of your head and but out.

  • MEAllred

    Why say that you’d only pick the Sony with a bunch of adapted glass? The obvious takeaway there is the native glass isn’t any good…

  • EsaTuunanen

    No worries about lack of possibilities for getting electrolyte in…
    That’s why they sealed only knobs and dials.
    I mean we can’t ask them to do more substantial sealing in camera of this price level…

    PS. Don’t check materials used in nowadays fashionable PC CPU “AIO water coolers” wanted by everyone and their dog.

  • I honestly don’t know what it will mean long-term. For a while, we’ll be spending a lot of money and renting a lot of mirrorless stuff for people to try; that usually lasts 6 months or so. I’m not sure after that.

  • Through a plastic spacer into the frame.

  • Assuming it’s not an SD second slot, it would probably be a separate board.

  • They aren’t that bad. Some are absolutely superb. They miss some things I would shoot with: tilt shifts, affordable telephoto primes. There is also, as would be inevitable when you bring out an incredible amount of new lenses rapidly, several that aren’t what I’d hope or that have consistency issues.

  • obican

    Roger Cicala (from Lensrentals.com) says that Roger Cicala (from Lensrentals.com) does think Roger Cicala (from Lensrentals.com) said that Sony lenses rule!

Follow on Feedly