Equipment

Teardown of the Canon EOS R Mirrorless Camera

I’ve wanted to look inside the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless cameras since the moment they were announced, so I’m probably more excited about this than you guys are. I’m really not sure what to expect. Early on, when we took apart a Sony A7R, we were struck by how clean and straightforward mirrorless cameras were compared to DSLRs. Later, we took apart an A7RIII and found that increased capabilities led to increased complexity, although still not as complex inside as a DSLR.

So we expected things not to be too complicated – no mirror box, optical prisms, off-sensor AF system, etc. We hope Canon cameras to have clean, even elegant, engineering; like the 5D IV teardown shows. We haven’t done a Nikon SLR teardown in quite a while (the D7000 was the last one), but their camera engineering is pretty similar to Canon’s, although being Nikon they still like to leave some soldered-wire connections here and there. So we figured that the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless full-frame cameras would be more straightforward than their SLR cameras, and perhaps Nikon set down the soldering gun and slowly stepped away.

But really we had no idea how things would look inside, if we might see some cool new engineering, what the weather resistance would be like, etc. So we took apart both a  Canon EOS-R and a Nikon Z7 just to have a look around. (The Z will get written up as soon as I can get to it.)

The EOS-R

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The Outside

Since this is a brand new camera to us, we started by removing all the grip rubber so we could see where most of the screws were. It’s worth noting that Canon seems to have new grip adhesive tape; it was both easier to remove and retained its stickiness for replacement better than what we’ve seen before. Important news for the none of you that intend to repair your cameras at home, but we like it.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Now the camera looks kind of like your dog shaved down for summer. I kind of like it, though. If I get one, I may just take the grips off. The shell, BTW, seems to be a polycarbonate with a slightly rough surface. It would grip nicely.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The rubber around the viewfinder is actually screwed into place. Good news for those of you who, like me, sometimes find yourself wondering when the viewfinder rubber came off. Bad news for those of you who like to take it off on purpose for some reason or other.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Next, we went to the side to remove the I/O port covers. This is held on by four screws; removing those lets it slide right off.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the cover off we see a very nice flex along the I/O ports. Why ‘nice’ you ask? Because that means that some or all of the I/O ports are not soldered to the main PCB. We have to replace a lot of main PCBs because someone jerked a cable, pulling an I/O port off of the board.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Next, we remove all the visible screws around the body.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

And the diopter adjustment from the viewfinder.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

There is a nice thick weather seal under the diopter adjustment knob. For those who want to skip ahead, the knobs and dials are all weather sealed nicely, but not much else. As long as it only rains on your knobs and dials, though, you should be fine.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Opening the Case

With all the screws out, the back assembly can be removed, LCD and all, after the flexes between it and the main PCB are detached.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

At a glance, this looks much like a Canon SLR: the back assembly containing the LCD and controls, the main PCB with neatly laid out flexes.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Looking closer, there are some apparent differences. First among these is that the shutter motor and electronics are at the bottom of the camera, underneath the shutter box. In a Canon DSLR, it’s generally to one side.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Here’s a close up of the shutter motor for those into such things.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

I should also show there’s weather sealing below each of the top dials. As you can see to the right of that, though, the rest of the body depends on a plastic overlap to keep stuff out, there are no gaskets.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The Back and LCD Assembly

The back panel looks like the rear panel from any camera with a hinged LCD. There’s shielding over the controls (left in the picture below) and connections are going out to the LCD.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

One thing that caught our attention immediately was the LCD attachment. You can see it seems only held down by two screws and a metal clamp. This could be great (LCD change is a common repair) unless it’s weak (making LCD replacement a more common repair).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The bracket looks pretty robust, though, and the screws holding it down are the largest in the camera by far.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The bottom line is it makes LCD replacement something takes minutes, not hours.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

And the bracing and weather sealing around the bracket are excellent and sturdy.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

While we were back here, we removed the shielding to look at the weather sealing around the buttons. Again, thick and excellent.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Other Subassemblies

We’d already unfastened all the screws and disconnected flexes, so we slid out the I/O subassembly.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

I was a little disappointed, but not surprised, that it contained only the RCA-type plugs. Better than nothing, of course, but the HDMI plug is the one that rips off the board most frequently, at least in our experience.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Similarly, the EVF had already been disconnected so it could slide right out.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Finally, the top assembly was removed (there were two more screws internally holding this on).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The top assembly has a lot of electronics and connections: EVF, various selectors and switches, the top LCD, and the touch bar. From a repair standpoint the top assembly is a single part; if anything in there breaks, you replace the whole thing. It can be disassembled but it’s very time consuming, and there’s no reason to. I will note, because the photo is small, that there is no weather-sealing foam along the edges. Plastic-to-plastic contact is all the weather sealing there is.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Main Body

With all the subassemblies removed, Aaron just had to remove the half dozen screws to take off the main PCB.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

You can see a small electrical shield on the surface of the board in the image above; there’s more significant shielding underneath.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the shields removed we can see the PCB is not particularly dense.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The inner side shows the SD card slot soldered to the board. Repair guys hate this since a broken card slot means replacing the entire board, but SD card slots are certainly more reliable than CF slots. Soldering the SD assembly to the board is the way it’s usually done.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

With the PCB removed, all that’s left to see is the image sensor’s board (green), the shutter mechanism below it, and the battery box (black). Like all mirrorless cameras, the EOS-R is simpler than an SLR.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

If you look carefully at the aluminum frame over the image sensor, you’ll notice 3 Torx (star) screw heads, two along the left side, one in the upper right. These are the sensor adjustment screws. During assembly, the image sensor is adjusted so that it is perfectly (in theory) aligned with the lens mount.

Each of these screws is spring-loaded. They are loosened and tightened during the adjustment process to align the sensor and lens mount to be within a few microns of parallel. We don’t have the automated equipment to do this adjustment (we can do it, but it involves hours of trial and error) so we aren’t going to do any further disassembly of the sensor plate.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The last piece to take off is the bottom plate.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

While there was no weather sealing around the edges of the plate, but there is some at the tripod mount.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

The tripod mounting plate comes off next, and there’s an important detail here. The tripod screw inserts into a pressed out cup (red arrow).

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

We like long cups because a long tripod plate screw (and they vary in length) can pop the top of a short cup out, leaving a free-floating piece of metal inside your camera. Free-floating metal inside your camera is a bad thing. A very bad thing. This one is nice and long and I can’t imagine a problem occurring.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Here is the socket in the camera that the tripod cup sits in. The aluminum plate that you see crossing the hole is the sensor frame. You can see this would be a bad place to have a piece of metal floating around in. Not to mention a bad place to have a hole open to the environment.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

 

Before we start putting things back together, we’ll show you a front view of the stripped down camera. I’ll mention that I like that auto-close shutter feature a lot.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Summary

It was rather a boring disassembly, really, about what we should expect for Canon doing a Canon 6D Mark II quality mirrorless camera. It’s neatly laid out and nicely engineered inside. One thing that struck me is that it’s not very crowded inside there, or as we like to say ‘they left a lot of air inside’.

This view that I haven’t shown you yet, kind of illustrates that; there’s a pretty big gap between the circuit boards and the image sensor. If you look back at the Sony A7R III teardown (or the Nikon Z teardown to come) you’ll notice there’s not that much space inside; it’s taken up by the IBIS system which is big and thick.

Lensrentals.com, 2018

Do I think future Rs are going to have IBIS? No, I don’t. Canon has been very clear that they think lens stabilization is superior. The space is probably just a matter of ergonomics and perhaps heat diffusion. But there’s certainly room for it.

Speaking of the Sony A7RIII, it’s taken a bit of internet trashing for its lack of weather sealing. Throw no stones from your glass house, oh Canon shooters. The Canon EOS-R is just about the same; well-sealed buttons and dials, not much else. That means, I think, that it will be fine in a misty rain for a while, but don’t get it saturated and don’t set it somewhere wet.

You can make an argument that tightly fitted plastic shells are good weather sealing. Then again, you can argue that weather sealing means waterproof. Lots of people do that on the way to finding out the warranty doesn’t cover water damage.

The Canon EOS-R sells currently for $2299. It’s very close in build quality and weather sealing to the Canon 6D II which sells for about $1600. So for $600 you get the R mount, cool new slider bar thingie, a bit better (we assume) processing and four more megapixels. That actually sounds fairly reasonable to me.

Reason also suggests Canon is working the kinks out with a (fairly) reasonably priced camera before they come out with a mirrorless pro-level camera. But being reasonable never got anybody anywhere on the internet. The internet is filled with people pretending they’re moving from one brand to another as they justify the choices they’ve already made. So I will, in internet fashion, do some click-bait brand comparison.

The Sony A7r III can be had for a bit under $3,000, has equal build quality, a better native lens selection, more megapixels, etc. My opinion is it’s a better camera (not necessarily system) for the money. It should be; we’re comparing the first generation to a fourth generation.

The Nikon Z6 (comparable to the Canon EOS-R) is $2150 while the Nikon Z7 (comparable to the Sony A7RIII, at least in megapixels) runs a touch over $3,500. I’ll make more build quality comparison’s when I’ve taken a Z apart.

So, which would I buy, right now? None of the above; I don’t know enough yet, and I try very hard to avoid Generation 1 technology. If you forced me into a corner and said: “if you made your living with a camera, what would you shoot today?” I’d say either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR.

That’s today, and that’s my logical answer. Tomorrow (tomorrow being a couple of years) I will absolutely be shooting a mirrorless camera, but I have no idea yet which one. Of course, those of you who know me very well know I won’t be able to stand it, and I’ll ignore my own advice and get one of these in a month or two; and almost certainly decide it was the wrong one a month or two after that.

 

 

Roger Cicala and Aaron Closz

Lensrentals.com

October, 2018

Author: Roger Cicala

I’m Roger and I am the founder of Lensrentals.com. Hailed as one of the optic nerds here, I enjoy shooting collimated light through 30X microscope objectives in my spare time. When I do take real pictures I like using something different: a Medium format, or Pentax K1, or a Sony RX1R.

Posted in Equipment
  • Probably both heat and ergonomics; I’m sure they wanted a body of a certain size. And I expect there might be more chips, maybe even a secondary board in whatever “pro mirrorless” camera comes out one day.

  • Roger doesn’t think Roger said that, or did he mean too. But Roger did say, and did mean, that Canon’s 40 years has led to a broader lens lineup than Sony’s 4 years. Cause, well, common sense.

  • Per Inge Oestmoen

    Nice camera, and nice job by Roger as always.

    Mirrorless is fine, if video is important.

    If still images are more important, SLR holds its ground and will continue to do so in my opinion.

    Adapted lenses is not a good solution. No, the adapter has no influence at all on the optics, but we have not invested $$$$ in lenses to use them with a clunky adapter. Yes, it means clunkiness to have to insert an adapter the size of an extension tube between the body and each and every lens. Compatibility means the lens can be used natively with no need for an adapter.

    I, for one, will stick with SLR’s for that reason and several other reasons. A SLR with an optical finder and a sensor that “rests” between exposures has much better battery life given a specific battery capacity in mAh. If there had been no optical viewfinders in existence, the optical viewfinder would have to be invented.

  • Panacea

    Nobody in this thread had yet to catch that obican posts in EVERY lensrentals blog post as (barely) a parody of the editor of a certain Sony-centric site infamous for misrepresenting Roger’s words into candy for the Sony fanboys.

  • EVener

    Sorry, I forgot to put my fanboy blinders on.

    Roger wrote: “So, which would I buy, right now? None of the above; I don’t know enough yet, and I try very hard to avoid Generation 1 technology. If you forced me into a corner and said: “if you made your living with a camera, what would you shoot today?” I’d say either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR.

    That’s today, and that’s my logical answer. Tomorrow (tomorrow being a couple of years) I will absolutely be shooting a mirrorless camera, but I have no idea yet which one. Of course, those of you who know me very well know I won’t be able to stand it, and I’ll ignore my own advice and get one of these in a month or two; and almost certainly decide it was the wrong one a month or two after that.”

    That does not read like a ringing endorsement to me. Of the four working photographers I know well who shoot with Sony cameras: one shoots sports and concerts, one shoots landscapes, one shoots fine art, and the fourth uses his Sony’s for video work, all of them have tried using adapters with their A7R II, A& R III, and A9 camewras and not one of them have been happy with the results. However they all love the Zeiss for Sony and Sony lenses.

  • Refurb7

    No he didn’t. He said, “I’d say either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR.” Please take a reading comprehension class yourself.

  • MEAllred

    Roger basically says all the Sony lenses suck. As a Sony shooter, this is disturbing news as this is by far the most important part.

    I’m shocked by the statement and I think it deserves more discussion from him than a one sentence take down of the Sony lens line.

    Additionally, Sonys been at mirrorless for several generations now, and we have to do a bunch of arm twisting for Roger to pick Sony as the best camera/system currently – that’s a very sad state of affairs for Sony…

  • EVener

    Roger, that was fascinating.

    You remark “This view that I haven’t shown you yet, kind of illustrates that; there’s a pretty big gap between the circuit boards and the image sensor” and go on to say that you believe that Canon will not be filling that space with an IBIS system. Do you think the extra space is there to help dissipate reduce heat build up while shooting video or very long exposures?

  • MEAllred

    No he didn’t. He said he’d pick the Sony with adapted lenses. Please take a reading comprehension class

  • EVener

    he also says he’d avoid the Sony mirrorless systems as well.

  • Will we be seeing optical evaluation of the lenses? I’m particularly interested in the 24-105 and 50mm.

  • bokesan

    May apply to digital, but I think there are a lot of people who are not afraid to take tools to their older cameras (from repairing a hole in bellows to applying a bit of oil or replacing that mirror dampening foam).

  • Freddo

    As an engineer (of sorts), the optimistic mixing of various metals and alloys I see in camera teardowns makes me cringe every time. It’s like a smörgåsbord of galvanic corrosion opportunities. But I guess it’s all going to be dandy as long as no electrolyte (water) is added. Then it’s game over anyway. 😛

    “If you forced me into a corner and said: “if you made your living with a camera, what would you shoot today?” I’d say either a Sony with a lot of adapted lenses or an SLR.” Are Sony lenses really that bad Roger? (I shoot Sony, but with unadapted Zeiss Loxia glass.)

  • Jam005

    So, by the looks of it, there’s ample space to assemble the 2nd card slot. Would it piggy back? Or mini standoff board? How would you suppose they would go about? curious.

  • desertglow2

    Hello Roger, just a question, is the mount bolted directly into the magnesium frame, or in between there’s a black plastic spacer… on 5d MK iv there are 4 bolts screwed on plastic…I hope on this camera they made it more robust (i noticed they put 5 instead of 4) by screwing on magnesium alloy.

  • One thing going for the Olympus is the sensor size, it’s approximately four times smaller than a full frame sensor. Chance of dust landing on the sensor is thus smaller, but if that happens, it will appear proportionally larger in the image.

    But I believe big part of the equation is the Olympus dust reduction system. IIRC Pentax also uses Olympus developed DR, and the same will also be implemented in the coming Ricoh GRIII. Wouldn’t be surprised if other manufacturers also use it.

  • JosephAndrews

    1. Thanks for the (literal!) nuts-and-bolts teardown and the resulting images
    2. Thanks even more for the nuts-and-bolts writing style; I always know I’ll leave this website feeling a bit smarter.

    It did just occur to me, Roger, after finding out (too late to buy) that a fabulous bargain for a Canon 5DMk4 with kit lens (and US warranty) was available for a few hours last night…that even had I been ‘in time’…I would not have pulled the trigger.

    Why? My Mk3 is fine for my current needs…and to be honest my stable of EOS M-format cameras (including the wonderful M6) gets used more often these days. I’ve also put off the purchase of at least one EF lens (the 11-24)…which makes it more likely that I’ll be renting that baby from you!

    What does Canon’s move to full-frame mirrorless mean for your business, Roger? I know it has changed how I look at buying additional Canon gear.

    Thanks for reading (and writing).

  • obican

    Roger Cicala (from Lensrentals.com) says he’d try very hard to avoid CaNikon mirrorless systems.

  • Stanislaw Zolczynski

    Yes it does, Nikon z7 when powered off. I had it in my hands. The question is whether it does automatically when removing the lens as it should.

  • It is magnesium alloy, as they say, but it’s got quite a different feel to it.

  • Maya

    I am not concerned by it. I’m sure Canon has done their homework and that this is what they think is best for them. I’m questioning people’s assertion that it’s necessarily going to limit the quantity of dust that will eventually settle on their sensor, and that it’s a solution that’s “obvious” or should be implemented in all other cameras. Roger will have more to comment, particularly in the long run with Lensrental’s experience of various FF mirrorless cameras’ cleaning requirements.

    As far as I’m concerned, my anecdotal experience tells me that there is no correlation between dust on a sensor and sensor exposure to the elements. As I said, the camera that gave me the least amount of dust problems are my ex OM-D E-M1s, which sensors always exposed. Why is that ? I don’t know. More effective dust reduction system ? Thicker filter stack ? And the camera that’s giving me the most issues ? My Canon 6D, despite its sensor being “shielded by mirror, apples and pears”. Anyway, proof is in the pudding !

    Regarding the Z7, I don’t think that it closes its shutter blades when powered off. What I read was that it locks the sensor’s IBIS system so that it doesn’t move about inside the camera when it’s powered off, like the OM-D E-M1.

  • Stanislaw Zolczynski

    Why you should be concerned with auto shutter closing.? Very wise move. All previous mirrorless didn`t have it, the only exception was my old Ricoh GRX m-module. I wonder how you could avoid tiny droplets of mist in blowing wind. We are talking about mirrorless not DSLR where sensor is kind of shielded by mirror, apples and pears. Beside it you may disable the feature in menu, at least in Ricoh, for cleaning purpose. When I tried NikonZ7 they told me that it caps the sensor when powered off but they couldn´t find out if it does it automatically.

  • jp

    Thanks Roger,
    Well, how it will be next EOS R “professional”,…. full weather sealed??…. Less plastic…. and near heavy as the EOS 1D!???
    Hm, Canon take care about weather sealed body! That could be a “NO-GO” for much Mirrorless fan photo/videographer…

  • Oh, God! I’m blind! 🙂

  • Peter

    And what about this: “Important news for the none of you that intend to repair your cameras at home, but we like it.”

  • Dust on the sensor is a very relative problem with the many variables that come into the equation. For example, I have Canon EOS 5D Mark II for 7 years, with far more than 200.000 shots, and I never had to clean the sensor – I just cleaned it in 3-4 times with a regular blower. The sensor on my Canon EOS 80D, in the past two and a half years, has never had to be cleaned, except once and that time also with regular blower.

    I think, like Mr Cicala, that this is a good move by Canon that will prove justified in the long run for those who have problems with the dust on their sensors.

  • Maya

    Thanks for the teardown.

    And now the big question : have you already managed to “accidentally” break these new toys to *lowers voice* get parts for lens testing ?

    I’m skeptical about the shutter closing when changing lenses. I have seen zero correlation with the cameras I’ve owned between how much the sensor is exposed and how much dust ultimately settles on it. I never had to clean my OM-D E-M1 sensor, only a few times my 5DIII’s, and nearly all the time my 6D’s. I guess that as far as Canon is concerned, they’ve done their homework and found that it worked best for them this way, but I wouldn’t presume in the absence of long term data that this is the best solution for everyone.

  • Oh, yes…! How did I miss it!? That is, I did not laugh at that statement – now I’m worried about myself! 🙂

  • bokesan

    Oh, I kind of liked “As long as it only rains on your knobs and dials, …”

  • Thank you, Mr Cicala, for another great article. Although, I have to admit, I’m a bit worried about you! Always in your article I expect some great joke – this time nothing! Are you OK? 😉

    But the real reason for this comment is to check if you have made a mistake regarding the type of material from which Canon EOS R was made.
    I think, with official papers and photographs from Canon in mind, that the body of the camera is made of magnesium alloy.

    I quote a statement from the Canon official site:

    “Magnesium Alloy Body
    Comfortable and solid in the hand, the EOS R camera features a rigid yet lightweight magnesium alloy chassis that enhances body durability while shielding the camera from electromagnetic radiation and heat. It also has a tempered front panel for internal rigidity.”

    Also attached to this comment is the image of the Canon EOS R (used without permission :p ) which clearly shows that the body is a magnesium alloy. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/869ac9713ea685e2ba269c7dbabd3e3f3ec2ded78a14f21f4f96e2c1eed48fd8.jpg

    Can you confirm it, or you may still be arguing that it is a plastic material?
    Once again thank you and best regards!

Follow on Feedly